Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of June 1 - 5, 2020
June 06, 2020

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

King v. Pridmore - § 1983, qualified immunity, state agent
Du Jour v. USAG - immigration
Cowen v. Ga Sec of State - elections, ballot access, constitutional challenges
Microf v. Cumbess - bankruptcy
USA v. McGregor - evidence
Isiah v. JPMorgan Chase - FUFTA, Ponzi scheme
USA v. Andres - untimely suppression motion; sentencing

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Valentine v. State - capital case, postconviction relief
Adv Op re Weapons - constitution, citizen initiative
Patrick v. State - capital case, postconviction relief
McDonald v. State - capital case, postconviction relief

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Patronis v. United Ins - insurance, death database, due process, retroactivity
Smith v. State - sentencing, trial court jurisdiction
Baldwin v. State - sentencing, certified conflict
Merriweather v. State - pro se sanctions

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Jenkins v. State - public defender fee
Drake v. DCF - involuntary commitment, sexual predator
DTM v. Judd - risk protection order, firearms, constitutional challenge
Hamilton v. State - competency
Collier Condo v. Foresman - inconsistent order, recommendation
Orcutt v. State - appellate jurisdiction, mandamus, parole
Casaigne v. State - postconviction relief
Edwards v. State - probation revocation
Rivercrest v. Am Homes - homeowners' association, declaration, injunction
Davis v. State - judicial disqualification, direct appeal, certified question
Jackson v. Blazer - equitable distribution
Wiley v. State - constructive possession
Moore v. State - instructions, grand theft; paraphernalia possession
Singer v. Singer - reopening evidence; interest on equalizing payment
Marc J Soss v. Bloom - guardianship, trustee, fees
Brungart v. Pullen - dating violence injunction
LA v. DCF - parental rights, termination

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Jockey Club v. Jockey Club Maint - real property, development, covenants
MacCauley v. State - murder, evidence
Diageo Dominicana v. United Brands - commercial dispute, good faith covenant
Gonzalez v. State - postconviction relief
Philip Morris v. Chadwell - impeachment, asbestos, prior claim form; fraud; certified conflict
Wallace v. Comp Pers Care - trustee removal
Damicet v. Sidauy - personal jurisdiction, forum nonconveniens
Lake Sana Dev v. Miami-Dade - development, unusual use application
RS v. DCF - dependency

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Strems Law Firm v. Avatar Prop & Caus Ins - sanctions, due process
Walker v. Geico - insurance, coverage limits
Frye v. Cuomo - dissolution, blood alcohol content testing
State v. Morris - continuous mental incompetence
Milanes v. State - probation revocation
Hunt v. State - sentencing
Morgan v. State - sentencing, ranking chart

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Burns v. Houk - timesharing, contempt
Roundtree v. State- Anders appeal, written order
Hagan v. State - postconviction relief
Dice v. State - Anders appeal, costs
Palmer v. State - judgment, sentence, clerical error
Cochran v. State - Anders appeal, costs
Gordon v. State - Anders appeal, costs
Longworth v. Richmond - certiorari, lis pendens, evidentiary hearing
Wooley v. State - Anders appeal, costs
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.