Menu

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of March 16 - 20, 2020

Appellate & Trial Support   |   March 20, 2020
Download Download   
Share Share Page

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

US v. Cingari - sentencing
Spencer v. Specialty Foundry Prods - CAFA

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Boyd v. State - capital case, postconviction relief
In re Primary Elections- constitution, initiative, open primaries
Reed v. State - capital case, postconviction relief
In re Fla R Jud Admin - chief justice, emergency response

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

No decisions this week.

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

JMH v. State - juvenile sentencing
Cox v. State - postconviction relief
State v. Moran - juvenile sentencing
US Bank v. Mink - foreclosure, standing
Pittman v. State - postconviction relief, sentencing
Agosto v. State - criminal contempt
Alvarez v. State - probation revocation
Corey v. Neuffer - foreclosure sale, surplus funds
State v. Hall - certiorari, Williams rule evidence
Woolman v. State - evidence, collateral crimes; instructions, sexual battery
Clifford v. State - sentencing
Nelson v. State - Stand Your Ground
Wolf v. Wolf - contempt; timesharing
Manatee v. Mandarin Dev - comprehensive plan, constitutional challenge, limitations
Ford v. State - community control revocation
Booth v. Williams - timesharing, due process, unrequested relief
Lupo v. Lawson - real property, partition
Bailey v. State - probation revocation
Brundage v. Evans - certiorari, presuit requirements
Mallery v. Bush Auto - second-tier certiorari, towing, private action
Moore v. Holton - child support, income withhold

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Taylor v. FNMA - foreclosure, possession, tenant
Potter v. State - drug possession, prescription, instructions
JJ v. State - drug possession
Citizens v. Kings Creeks - named perils insurance, causation defense
Citizens v. Vazquez - insurance, actual cash value; declaratory relief, settled question
Zamanillo v. Citizens - insurance, coverage
Citizens v. Tio - insurance, replacement cost
Vazquez v. Citizens - summary judgment, supporting evidence
Royal Harbor v. Maresma - business judgment rule
Diaz v. Diaz - equitable distribution
Hatoum v. Citizens - summary judgment, supporting evidence
Muhammad v. AJX Mort - foreclosure, publication of notice
DR v. United Healthcare - Medicaid benefits, home health care
Piquet Realty v. Pinto - failure to prosecute
ER Truck v. Gomont - punitive damages amendment

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

O’Donnell v. WF Taylor - causation; products liability
State v. Ervin - sentencing
Mathieu v. State - postconviction relief
Graves v. State - pro se; withdraw of plea
Boukzam v. Jugo - child support; payments; depository
Marconi v. Erturk - marital dissolution; equitable distribution
Ramirez v. Ramirez - martial dissolution; due process

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Nutriband v. Advanced Health - dismissal, prejudice
State v. Griffith - sentence, downward departure
Frazier v. State - Richardson hearing
Hollinger v. Hollinger - partial summary judgment, stock agreement
Kern v. State - probation, revocation
Sitaram v. Alley - appellate jurisdiction
Edkin v. Edkin - dissolution, custody
Booker v. State - Spencer warning, pro se
Diaz v. State- probation, revocation
Houston v. State- Spencer warning, pro se
Brown v. State- Spencer warning, pro se
Colon v. State - Spencer warning, pro se


©2022 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Subscribe to Publications

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.