Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of March 30 - April 3, 2020
April 03, 2020

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Lukaj v. US - immigration
US v. Moore - shackling, jury note, jurisdiction
Sealey v. Warden - habeas corpus
Monaghan v. Worldpay US - Title VII, retaliation

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Bright v. State - capital case, direct appeal
State v. Poole - capital case, postconviction relief

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Young v. State - child victim hearsay
Eveleigh v. Eveleigh - appellate jurisdiction
Key v. State - jail credit
Pocock v. Pocock - notice, evidentiary hearing
Wilson v. State - prohibition, Stand Your Ground
Fairway Oaks v. Jacksonville - appellate jurisdiction
Earnest v. State - state discovery violation; battery, lesser included
Barr v. State - new trial standard
Heckman's Ins v. Craig Jernigan Enters - certiorari, timeliness
State v. DMM - search and seizure

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Sutton v. State - competency
Schwanger v. State - sentencing
Morgan v. State - sentencing, certified conflict
Toler v. Pray - cross-examination right
Jensen v. Pinellas Cnty - firearms, ordinance challenge, right to amend
Stephens v. State - appellate venue, jurisdiction
Lambert v. Emerson - dangerous instrumentality doctrine, certified question
Acquisition Trust v. Laurel Pinebrook - lease, right of first refusal
MacDonnell v. US Bank - foreclosure, voidness, unliquidated damages
Franks v. State - plea withdrawal

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Wright v. State - violent career criminal
Medina v. Genex - intentional infliction, emotional distress
Harmon v. State - concealed firearm
McDuffie v. Uribe - evidence, prior testimony, treating physician
People's Trust v. Valentin - insurance, breach, declaratory relief, specific performance
Jackson Heights v. AHCA - administrative review, limitations, preservation
Levy v. Makri - child custody
Martinez v. Pascual - real property, partition, former spouses
78D Team v. US Bank - foreclosure, standing, constitutional challenge
State Farm v. Chirino - certiorari, property inspection, video recording
Mgmt & Consult v. Tech Elec - certiorari, lien discharge
Sawyer v. State - prohibition, judicial disqualification
Harris v. State - mandamus, jail credit
Espinosa v. Pavel Pardo - LLC interest, forfeiture for theft

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

McGraw v. State - blood draw, warrant
Roberts v. State - lesser included offense, instruction
Sparks v. State - Stand Your Ground, effective date, amendment
Abad v. G4S - Pulse nightclub shooting, negligence, legal duty
Jeanbart v. State - lack of intent defense; firearm as evidence
Hollingsworth v. State - probation revocation; sentencing
Ramblewood v. Kaye Bender - attorney's fees, expert
Dejour v. Coral Springs KGB - settlement, meeting of minds
Johansson v. Johansson - child support, attorney's fees, ability to pay
BN v. DCF - parental rights, termination

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

State Farm v. Speed Dry - insurance, compelled appraisal
Bruzzese v. State - resisting arrest, double jeopardy
Citibank v. Ward - foreclosure, verified complaint
Wilmington Savings v. Tacoronte - foreclosure, verified complaint
LeBlanc v. State - Spencer warning, pro se
Powers v. State - special concurrence, felon voting
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.