Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of November 2 - 6, 2020
November 07, 2020

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

SCAD v. Sportswear - remand to clarify judgment on appeal
Teasley v. Warden - postconviction relief, juror bias, juror non-impeachment
TriNet v. USA - FICA tax, withholding

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Owen v. State - capital case, postconviction relief
In re Judge Miller - judicial discipline

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Noland v. Deerfield Bch - workers' compensation
Weston v. Weston - prisoner, right to attend hearing
Sunseeker Inv v. Enterprise Maint - collateral estoppel
Scheel v. State - Stand Your Ground
Am Zurich Ins v. Steel - certiorari, standard
Mack v. Mack - domestic violence injunction
Williams v. State - habeas corpus, manifest injustice
Louviere v. State - evidence, prior convictions, reputation
Kelsey v. State - sentencing
Helweg v. Bugby - domestic violence injunction
Lynne v. Landsman - indirect civil contempt
Miami Divers v. RAAC - appellate jurisdiction
Hartman v. DOC - appellate jurisdiction

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Morgan & Morgan v. Pollock - legal malpractice, collectability
Lachman v. State - admitted guilt, invited error
Charles v. State - verdict form, separate episodes
Am Cap Assur v. Leeward Bay CA - insurance appraisal

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Robinson v. State - double jeopardy, single homicide rule
Lanson v. Reid - § 57.105 award
ND v. State - threatening communications, constitutional challenges
Sheddf2-FL3 v. Penthouse S - settlement, unconscionability
Martinez de Castro v. Stoddard - defamation, public official immunity
ESJ JI Op v. Domeck - settlement proposal, good faith, due process
Regions Bk v. Squitieri - garnishment, exemption, hearing
People's Trust v. Gonzalez - appellate jurisdiction, certiorari, order to pay
Citizens v. Carlyle Towers - insurance appraisal
Miami-Dade v. Miami Gardens Sq One - COVID injunction, curfew, preemption

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Miller v. Henderson Machine - pro se representation
Cash v. Gagnon - injunction, neighborhood interactions
Devino v. 2436 E Las Olas - easement appurtenant
Langsetmo v. Metza - contempt, exceptions
Macedo v. State - probable cause
Bott v. State - inconsistent verdict, aggravated assault
Pride of St. Lucie v. Reed - negligent security
JB Investment v. Deutsche Bank - foreclosure, damages, remand
Clark v. State - probation revocation
Fettig's Constr v. Paradise Props - mechanic's lien
Joe v. State - postconviction relief, newly discovered evidence

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Rotunda v. Rotunda - dissolution, attorney's fees
Aburoumi v. Espinosa - retroactive child support, trial by consent
Harvey v. Lifespace Communities - compel arbitration
Ballow v. State - certiorari, probation modification
Routhier v. Barnes - Younkin, certified question; med mal, expert financial discovery
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.