Menu

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of August 2 - 6, 2021

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of August 2 - 6, 2021

Appellate & Trial Support   |   August 6, 2021
Download Download   
Share Share Page

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Pinnacle v. Pinnacle - trademark
Bell v. Broward Sheriff - First Amendment retaliation
US v. Carter - sentencing
Hakki v. VA - APA
Bulkwalter v. SS Comm’r - disability benefits
US v. Van Buren - computer fraud
Simpson v. US Atty Gen - removal
US v. Cordero - supervised release
Flock of Seagirls v. Walton Cty - easements
Boigris v. EWC P&T - trademark

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

No decisions this week

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

EK v. DCF - parental rights, termination
Tsuji v. Fleet - probate, limitations period, certified conflict
Schulte v. State - sentencing
Morris v. State - Stand Your Ground
GI Shavings v. Arlington Ridge - environmental permitting, mootness
Jackson v. Okaloosa Sch Bd - fees, suspension by governor, separation of powers
Brown v. US Bank - Applegate affirmance
Riverside Ave v. 1661 Riverside CA - condominium, covenants, limitations
KM v. DCF - parental rights, termination
Maxey v. State - certiorari, timeliness

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

JAR v. State - public defender fee
Marks v. Shafton - equitable distribution
Miller v. Green - § 61.14, child support, challenge, timeliness
Dibelka v. State - sentencing, monetary obligations
Aristidou v. State - probation revocation
Christopher v. Bank of Am - foreclosure, vacatur, bankruptcy

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Nunez v. Universal - directed verdict, breach, new trial
Heritage v. Virginia Gardens Condo - compel appraisal
Garcia v. Evertz - jurisdiction, untimely
United v. Progressive Health - summary judgment, affidavit
Nelson v. State - traffic infraction, subject matter jurisdiction
Cole v. State - postconviction relief, plea withdrawal

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Ford v. Boynton Beach - probable cause, false arrest, wiretap
200 Presidential Way v. BNY Mellon - recording, mortgage assignment, notice
VS v. DCF - certified question, parental rights
FGAP Invest v. A1 Body - vehicle repair shop lien, standing
Harrison v. Stratos - state employee, immunity, bad faith

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Alvarez v. State Bd of Admin - retirement assets, transfer
State v. Miller - postconviction relief
Zalloum v. Bank of NY - foreclosure sale; appellate dismissal, moot
Martinez v. State - Anders appeal, scrivener’s error
Brown v. Garcia - injunction for protection, dissolution
Tanner v. State - Anders appeal, cost
Knight v. State - Spencer warning, pro se


©2022 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Subscribe to Publications

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.