Menu

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of February 15 - 19, 2021

Appellate & Trial Support   |   February 19, 2021
Download Download   
Share Share Page

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Bibby v. MIC - vacating this, FCA, materiality, public disclosure, personal jurisdiction
Rohe v. Wells Fargo - All Writs Act, bankruptcy
Camarena v. ICE - immigration, removal, jurisdiction
Barrios v. DHS - immigration, removal, jurisdiction

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Krol v. FCA - MMWA, single document rule, arbitration agreement
In re Fla Prob R - amended rules

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Ferguson v. Inch - sentencing
Dozier v. Duval Cnty Sch Bd - school guardians, firearms on campus
Shaw v. Shaw - attorney's fees, findings
Seale v. State - postconviction relief
Mims v. State - postconviction relief
Tyson v. Tyson - premature appeal, fees without amount
DOH v. Favero Orchids - administrative challenge, fees and costs award
Lofton v. State - plea bargain, right to appeal
Flagg v. State - pro se sanctions

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Nichols v. State - incomplete jury instructions, alligators
DAW v. State - sentencing
Williams v. Samuels - contempt, required findings

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Baxter v. State - manslaughter, evidence
Salazar v. Gomez - fraud on court, inconsistent statements
Schuenzel v. Schuenzel - equitable distribution, fees without amount, prejudgment interest
Fernandez v. Citizens - insurance coverage, summary judgment
Corrales v. Corrales - equitable distribution, alimony
Corridon v. Corridon - marital dissolution, personal jurisdiction, child support
Stone v. Germann - summary affirmance
Desroses v. State - mootness
Thorson v. State - habeas corpus
Diaz v. State - sentencing
Stover v. DOH - physician discipline, emergency order review
Valencia v. Pennymac - certiorari, protective order, irreparable harm
VLH v. State - juvenile, probation violation
Grantley v. Miami-Dade Clerk - mandamus, confession of error
Samara v. Tenet Fla - appellate jurisdiction, rehearing denial

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Prentice v. State - sentencing
Butler v. Fla Peninsula Ins - insurance, Coblentz settlement, statute of limitations
Harrington v. Harrington - martial settlement, contempt, purge provision

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Saavedra v. Universal Property- summary judgment, conditions precedent, failure to plead
Jackson v. State - concurrence, cell passcode, self-incrimination
Capitaine v. State- Spencer warning, pro se
McClarty v. State - Spencer bar, pro se


©2020 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Subscribe to Publications

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.