Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of November 15 - 19, 2021
November 20, 2021

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Jackson v. Le Centre of Fourth LLC - bankruptcy, due process
Anderson v. Wilco Life Ins. Co.- Life insurance, policy interpretation
Charles v. Johnson - excessive force
State Farm v. Carapella - bankruptcy stay
Hunstein v. Preferred Collection & Mgmt - en banc, standing
Jathursan v. US AG - removal, Convention Against Torture
Callahan v. United Network for Organ Sharing - Access to judicial records
Johnson v. City of Miami Beach - excessive force

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Sheffield v. RJ Reynolds - punitive damages, Engle progeny
In re Fla R GPJA - amended rule
Fla Bar v. James - bar discipline
Robinson v. State - § 322.34(5), statutory construction

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Wallace v. State - double jeopardy
Univ Med Inv v. Mike Rollison Fence - default, damages, contract, ambiguity
Andreatta v. Brown - certiorari, privilege log, waiver
Charles v. DOH - administrative procedure, informal hearing, factual dispute
Bailey v. Brinson - settlement proposal, judgment obtained
Reynolds v. Reynolds - custody, time-sharing
Ragan v. State - sentencing
Howliet v. State - sentencing
Addison v. State - certiorari, competency exam
Walker v. State - represented pro se defendant
Bass v. State - represented pro se defendant
Manning v. State - represented pro se defendant

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

McDaniel v. State - probation revocation
Guzman v. State - post-conviction relief
Gordon v. State - involuntary commitment, nonjury trial
Largo Med Cntr v. Kowalski - hospital privileges, attorney's fees
Harby v. Harby - marital dissolution, alimony, child support
Williams v. State - evidence, breathalyzer
Katz v. Eastwood Pines - attorney's fees award
Pescod v. Irvin - timesharing, GAL report, mootness
Gambrel v. Sampson - mandamus, arbitration award

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

OneWest Bank v. Leek-Tannenbaum - foreclosure
Toiran v. State - Stand Your Ground
JPMorgan Chase v. llovet - certiorari, nonparty discovery
Perdomo v. State - criminal conspiracy, evidence
XB v. State - delinquency, trespass
United Auto v. Presgar Imaging - PIP benefits
DSLRPros v. Lalo - loan, pledge, guaranty
Tien v. In re Tien - will, probate, dismissal
IMC Hosp v. Ledford - certiorari, discovery, work product
Stroud v. State - sentencing
Adkins v. Sotolongo - appendix; certiorari, depositions

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Dabbs v. State - peremptory strike, disqualification
Whittaker v. Whittaker - dissolution, equitable distribution
Heslope v. Univ Prop & Caus - proof of loss, question of fact
Williams-Paris v. Joseph - probate, prenuptial agreement
Flooring Depot v. Wurtzebach - damages, piercing corporate veil
Jeda v. Gerasci - mootness, judicial intervention
Hobe-St Lucie Cons v. Martin County - special assessments
Inspired Prods v. Inspired Dev - proposal for settlement, costs
State Farm v. Palmetto Lakes - expert affidavit, striking
Covington v. State Farm - insurable interest
Maldonado v. State - sentencing

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Prush v. State - molestation, uncharged acts
Bridger v. State - probation, violation, affidavit
Mediate v. State - postconviction relief, prohibition
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.