Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of April 18 - 22, 2022

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of April 18 - 22, 2022

Appellate & Trial Support   |   April 22, 2022
Download Download   
Share Share Page

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Heyman v. Cooper - land use
Gulfstream Aerospace v. OceltipAviation - arbitration
US v. Smith - First Step Act
US v. Stowers - wiretaps, concurrence
US v. Mosely - sentencing
Speech First v. Cartwright - First Amendment, campus harassment, concurrence

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Boyle v. Samotin - medical negligence, tolling, presuit notice

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Cohen v. Autumn Village - Assisted Living Facilities Act, scope
State v. Mackendrick - postconviction relief
Philip Morris v. Manning - concurrence, venue, transfer
Briggs v. Briggs - marital dissolution
Astaphan v. DOH - medical license, emergency restriction

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

RJ Reynolds v. Jones - Engle, punitive damages
Massey v. Edison Ins - insurance, assignment of benefits, standing
Cintron v. State - theft, fair market value, jury instructions
Century-Nat'l Ins v. Regions All Care - insurance, PIP, overdue claim
Jones v. McKinney - probate, claims priority
Welch v. State - postconviction relief
Crawford v. Grubb - eviction, default judgment, premature
Hornsleuth v. McCloud - mandamus, CDC eviction moratorium, stay
Nasmin Enter v. Carliszle/Wilson - appellate jurisdiction
Kalogianis v. State - postconviction relief
Heritage v. Fairway - insurance, appraisal, supplemental claim

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Ordway v. Karibu Props - inter vivos transfer, donative intent
Unifirst v. Stronger Collision - ex parte arbitration
Levy v. Donnefeld - martial dissolution, time-sharing
Homestead v. USA - prohibition, Harris Act, quasi-legislative act
Parkhomchuk v. AIY - appellate jurisdiction, rendition, rule 1.540
Univ P&C v. Dimanche - default judgment, setting aside
Aersale v. Total Air Serv - statutory fuel lien
SA v. DCF - parental rights, termination
U of Miami v. Jones - medical malpractice, presuit requirements

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Montgomery v. State - peremptory challenge, reduce charge
Greenberg v. Bekins - discovery, damages
Garcia v. Soto - stalking, pattern of harassment
Porsche v. Copans Motors - franchise modification
Total Care v. Citizens - notice, assignment, insurance benefits
Cross v. State - warrantless search
Hollywood v. Haynie - sua sponte dismissal
Martin Memorial v. Gorham - certiorari, pre-suit requirements
Marcelus v. Aqua Finance - default judgment

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Graham v. Graham - alimony, child support, income calculation
Scaggs v. State - Anders, cost

©2023 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Subscribe to Publications


The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.