Menu

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of August 22 - 26, 2022

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of August 22 - 26, 2022

Appellate & Trial Support   |   August 26, 2022
Download Download   
Share Share Page

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Freeman v. Ala DOC - habeas, concurrence
King v. King - certified Ga law question
Richmond v. Badia - qualified immunity, dissent
Rodriguez v. BB&T - statutory repayment, limitations
Stansel v. Leucadendra 325 - judgment collection
US v. Ifediba - health care fraud
US v. Utsick - extradition, plea
Vapor Unlimited v. FDA - marketing, agency review, dissent

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

State v. Garcia - sentencing
Truppman v. Cozen O’Connor - prohibition, collateral estoppel
Conage v. USA - drug trafficking, purchase
1944 Beach Blvd v. Live Oak - secured transactions, financing statements, safe harbor
Covington v. State - capital case, postconviction relief
In re Fla R Civ P - amended rules
In re Fla R Crim P - amended criminal, civil, juvenile rules
In re Fla R Civ P - amended rules, preservation of error

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

State v. Hardley - sentencing
Hudson v. State - Miranda, suppression
Kirkpatrick v. State - postconviction relief
Matthews v. State - sentencing
Fryson v. State - postconviction relief
Harley-Davidson v. Adamec Cycle - administrative review, nonfinal order, jurisdiction
Findlay v. State - mandamus, mootness
Brown v. State - mandamus, mootness
Ballard v. Alachua - represented pro se filings
State v. Planned Parenthood - abortion, temporary injunction
Jones v. Schiller - election, qualifications, 365-day party membership

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

JBEC v. State - delinquency, restitution
Green v. Bordiuk - domestic violence injunction, changed circumstances

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Kraus v. Kraus - alimony, trial by consent
Nix v. Comm’r of Baseball - judgment on pleadings, limitations
Miedes v. Ideses - parenting plan, child support, modification
Miami v. Rivera - certiorari, defamation, absolute immunity
Ottawa Props v. US Bank - service of process
Vital Pharma v. Kesten - appellate jurisdiction, new appellate rule
Carnright v. State - criminal bond

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Hiatt v. Mathieu - paternity, child support, timesharing
Mays v. Joe Taylor Restoration - temporary injunction, overbroad, bond
State v. Bodrato - search and seizure, order to exit vehicle
In re: Steven Aubrey - name change, s. 68.07

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Fetchick v. Fetchick - attorney’s fees, amount, jurisdiction
At Home Auto v. Mendota Ins - transfer venue
VIP Glass v. Mendota Ins - transfer venue
Best v. State - special concurrence, sexual predator designation


©2022 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Subscribe to Publications

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.