Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of January 24 - 28, 2022

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Reproductive Health Servs v. Bailey - en banc rehearing, vacating this parental consent abortion opinion
Chamu v. US Att'y Gen - removal
Reeves v. Ala DOC - execution method, intellectual disability, ADA
US v. Schwarzbaum - tax penalties, willful conduct
Maldonado v. Baker Cnty Sheriff- in forma pauperis, mootness, exhaustion
Hoffman v. Signature Bank - Roth IRAs, bankruptcy exemption
US v. Nicholson - exclusionary rule, sufficiency of evidence

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Hayslip v. US Home - arbitration, real property, deed
Alachua Cnty v. Watson - sheriff's budget, county authority
In re R Reg Fla Bar - amended rules

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Pisano v. Mayo Clinic - Covid, hospital treatment, injunction
Harrison v. DMS - amending pleadings
Lack v. State - subject matter jurisdiction, misdemeanor
Noa v. Aventura - workers' compensation
People's Trust v. Foster - certiorari, discovery, underwriting manuals
Norman v. DOC - extensions of time
Mackey v. State - prohibition, criminal limitations period

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Hodo v. State - drugs, driver's license
Morrison v. Smolarick - partition action, money damages
Pulte v. New Common Sch - probate, settlement agreement, enforcement
Shanks v. Bergerman - promissory note, limitations period

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Forbes v. Millionaire Gallery - trade secrets, competition, verdict
Neff v. Archdiocese of Miami - duty of care, student
Azran Miami 2 v. US Bank - appellate filings, rules violations, show cause
Millan v. Marquez - default, due process, unliquidated damages
Bronstein v. Progressive - PIP benefits, confession of judgment
Gutierrez v. Sullivan - agency, apparent authority
Best Am Diag Cntr v. United Auto - confession of error, advisory opinion
State v. Avila - postconviction relief
Perez v. State - sentencing
Baron v. LP Evans Motors - arbitration, fees
Barg v. Casablanca - default judgment, vacatur
TR-B v. DCF - intervention, dependency proceeding
U of M v. Bloomer - certiorari, medical malpractice, presuit

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Huertas v. Avatar Prop - insurance, summary judgment, affidavit

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Saario v. Tiller - dissolution, marital property, alimony
Payne v. Koch - domestic violence injunction; exclude evidence, prejudice
Williams v. State - Spencer bar, pro se
Simmons v. State - sentence; prison releasee reoffender, § 775.082(9)

Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.