Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of November 14 - 18, 2022
November 19, 2022

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Ireland v Prummell - excessive force, deliberate indifference
Padilla v Redmont - subject matter jurisdiction, fees
Palm Beach Cnty v FAA - aviation regulations

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Sievers v. State - capital case, direct appeal
Somers v. USA - certified questions, 11th Circuit, assault
In re Fla R GP & JA - judicial papers

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Toufayan Bakery v. Darius - workers’ compensation
Reed v. State - communication privacy law
State v. Hamilton - search and seizure, blood draw, consent
Von Dyck v. Gavin - legal malpractice, limitations
Handy v. MW-Reserve - eviction, court registry payment
Tang v. Banks - Applegate affirmance
Earl v. State - untimely ineffective assistance
Odom v. State - certiorari, competency
TW v. DCF - parental rights, termination, failure to prosecute
Tally Mem’l v. Wiles - certiorari, report, Amendment 7, certified questions

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Marinec v. Progressive Select Ins - new trial standard
Bowers v. State - sentencing
Wharran v. Morgan - certiorari, discovery, cell phone records
Wallace v. Citizens - certiorari, expert deposition, scope
Etheridge v. Palm Garden - arbitration, authorization
Whitson v. Advocate 3413 - § 64.081 appellate fees, partition action
Estate of Tatum v. Clear Water Care - leave to amend pleadings
State v. Garcia - entrapment, jury question
State v. Islam - appellate jurisdiction, circuit court review
Bustos v. State - sentencing
BP v. State - delinquency, restitution
Bodie v. Cricket - arbitration, FDUTPA, representative claim prohibition
Pulido-Baeza v. State - postconviction relief
Salazar v. Dominguez - timesharing, modification, default, vacatur
Parkland CA v. Henderson - settlement agreement, enforcement, signature
Norman v. State - postconviction relief

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Dilver v. State - stalking and violence injunctions
Philip Morris v. Garcia - Engle progeny, closing arguments
J&R United Indus v. Miron - failure to file full-page transcript
Ecovirux v. Biopledge - forum selection clause
Bruno v. BHUJ - judicial sale, evidentiary hearing
Tower Imaging v. Direct General Ins - appellate jurisdiction, final order
Maya v. Deutsche Bank - Applegate affirmance
God’s Blessing v. Salas - maintenance and cure, injunction
Dieguez v. State - postconviction relief
Save Calusa v. Miami-Dade - second-tier certiorari, zoning

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Gateland v. Holly - waiver, service, personal jurisdiction; Condo Act, conditions precedent
Godwin v. State - postconviction relief
Johnson v. State - postconviction relief, entrapment defense

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Baum v. Becker Poliakoff - rehearing, malpractice, summary judgment
Thakkar v. Good Gateway - summary judgment, res judicata, collateral estoppel
Advanced 3-D v. Dir Gen Ins - summary judgment, confession of error
Central Fla Health v. Dir Gen Ins - summary judgment, confession of error
Black v. State - sentence, double jeopardy, confession of error
Eadie v. Gillis - dissolution, imputed income; charging lien, homestead property
Walt Disney Parks v. Alesi - discovery, work product, factual information
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.