Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of February 20 - 24, 2023
February 25, 2023

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

MSP Recovery v United Auto - insurance, dissent

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

No decisions this week

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Horne v. State - pro se Anders
Broward Sheriff v. Int’l Union Police Ass’ns - employment, retaliation, mootness, fees
Estremera v. FCOR - administrative review, preservation of error
Lange v. Cleveland Clinic - workers’ compensation
Debose v. State - supplementing record on appeal, public defender’s role
Ho v. State - pro se sanctions
Farmer v. State - public defender, withdrawal
DOR v. Int’l Bonded Couriers - prohibition, unadopted-rule proceeding

Second District Court of Appeal - St. Petersburg

Maddox v. Maddox - marital dissolution, business valuation, alimony
Petronex v. Maddox - intellectual property, marital asset, due process
OW v. State - delinquency, search and seizure
Oana v. Lupu - arbitration, confirmation, preservation of error
E Winds Consulting v. Amerifund - standing, surplus funds
Harlow v. State - sentencing
Cornelio v. DHSMV - second-tier certiorari, license suspension
Guerin v. Countryside N CA - foreclosure, fees, findings

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Comprehensive Health Ctr v. Star Cas Ins - PIP, exhaustion
AFP 103 v. Common Wealth Tr - easement, equitable defenses, preservation
IP v. State - zoom hearing
Pershing Indus v. StoneMor - contract interpretation
Clear 2 Close v. Zap Cap - service of process, waiver, default
US Aviation Underwriters v. Turnberry Airport - subrogation, waiver
Ron v. Parrado - arbitration clause, incorporation by reference
Unlimited Turf v. CP Global Consulting - dismissal, fraud, failure to state a claim
United Auto v. Fam Rehab - PIP, attorney’s fees
Lion Intel v. Quicksilver Cap - dismissal, hearing
Delgado v. Miller - prohibition, disqualification, successor judge
Sebelen v. Bulas - summary affirmance

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Murphy v. Pankauski - legal malpractice, pleading
Neal v. Geico - bad faith, civil remedy notice, waiver
Kittles v. State - involuntary plea, wavier of counsel
Lowe v. State - objections, timeliness
Craig v. State - probation, Richardson violation
Douchard v. State - conditions of probation
Perozo v. State - continuance to hire counsel
Huerta v. Grajales - dissolution, civil contempt, ability to pay
Gillig v. State - prior crime evidence
Rios v. Arias - paternity, parenting plan

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Woods v. Woods - domestic violence injunction, substantial evidence
Benson v. Progressive Ins - summary judgment, confession of error
Colley v. State - traffic appeal, appellate jurisdiction

Sixth District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Webster v. State - sentencing
May v. State - preservation of error, proffered testimony
Danforth v. Danforth - timeliness of appeal
Goodman v. Goodman - dissolution of marriage
State v. Tompkins - unreasonable seizure
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.