Menu

Avoiding Trouble Following In Limine Rulings

Appellate & Trial Support   |   March 1, 2016
Download   
Share Page

Trials often are preceded or interrupted by hearings on motions in limine, where parties attempt to limit the evidence or arguments that their opponents can utilize in the trial. These hearings are often fast-paced, with rulings for and against each side. Unfortunately, in such hearings, it is common for counsel to make off-the-cuff comments that, while intended to lessen the tension in the room, create potential problems if the case is later lost and those pre-trial rulings become the subject of an appeal.

Such a comment can be seen in Nomat v. Mota, 2016 IL App (1st) 140102-U, 2015 WL 9915490 (Ill. Ct. App. 2015), where the plaintiff successfully moved in limine to exclude testimony from a defense expert. After the trial court ruled, the defendant’s counsel stated, “I understand your ruling, your Honor, and I acknowledge the ruling. I’m not going to contest it.

Not surprisingly, when the defendant later lost the trial and contested the ruling on appeal, the plaintiff argued that the comment constituted a waiver. Fortunate for the defendant, the appellate court disagreed with the waiver argument and reached the merits of the exclusion.

Preservation Issues:

Waiving a position on a motion in limine through loose language after the trial court makes an adverse ruling

Tip:

When a trial judge rules on a motion in limine, especially at a hearing where many such motions are being considered, avoid unnecessary comments that may later be argued as abandoning or waiving a position. Phrases such as “thank you,” “I understand,” and “this is just for the record” may seem like simple courtesies to reduce the tension in the courtroom, but, depending on exactly what is said, they may create unnecessary appellate issues. The better approach—easier said than done, but important nonetheless—is to follow an adverse ruling by politely confirming an objection to the court’s ruling before moving on to the next issue.


©2018 Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Subscribe to Publications

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.