Menu

DOL Announces New Enforcement Policy on BIC Arbitration Limitation Class Actions

ERISA Employee Benefit Plan Litigation   |   Financial Services Regulatory   |   Labor & Employment   |   Securities and Derivative Litigation   |   Tax   |   August 31, 2017
Download   
Share Page

In order for fiduciaries to receive compensation that varies based on their investment advice (e.g., commissions) or from third parties in connection with their advice (e.g., revenue sharing), they must comply with a prohibited transaction exemption. In connection with the release of the new “investment advice” regulation, the Department of Labor (DOL) also issued two new class exemptions: the Best Interest Contract (BIC) exemption and the Principal Transactions In Certain Assets Between Investment Advice Fiduciaries and Employee Benefit Plans and IRAs (“Principal Transactions”) exemption.

Section II(f)(2) of both the BIC and Principal Transactions exemptions makes the exemptions unavailable if a financial institution’s contract with the advice recipient (a requirement of both exemptions) includes a waiver or qualification of the advice recipient’s right to bring or participate in a class action. Section II(g)(5) of both exemptions applies this condition to ERISA plans, which are not required to enter into the contract discussed previously.

The DOL’s current litigating position is that it will no longer defend these provisions prohibiting class action waivers as applied to arbitration agreements. In light of this change of position, the DOL has announced a new enforcement policy indicating it will not pursue a claim against any fiduciary based on the failure to satisfy the BIC or Principal Transactions exemption, or treat any fiduciary as being in violation of either exemption, if the sole failure of the fiduciary to comply with either exemption is a failure to comply with the exemptions’ arbitration limitation. The DOL indicated that the policy will continue to apply as long as the exemptions include the arbitration limitation.

If you have questions or need additional information, please contact James Jorden at (305) 347-6801, [email protected], Brian Perryman at (202) 295-6525, [email protected]; Michael Valerio at (860) 392-5046, [email protected]; or Stephen Kraus at (202) 965-8147, [email protected]


©2019 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Subscribe to Publications

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.