Menu

Unanimous California Supreme Court Gives Green Light to Plaintiffs to Discover Employee Contact Information

Class Actions   |   Construction   |   Insurance   |   Labor & Employment   |   Litigation and Trials   |   Real Estate   |   Wage and Hour   |   July 13, 2017
Download   
Share Page
Williams v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

In a big blow to employers, the California Supreme Court unanimously held today that plaintiffs and their lawyers must be given access to companywide employee contact information—including addresses and phone numbers—at the onset of a lawsuit and without first establishing a prima facie showing their case has merit. 

In Williams v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, S227228, Ct. App. 2/1 B259967, the California Supreme Court rejected both the trial court and lower appellate court’s holding that the plaintiff in a PAGA or Private Attorney General Action could only get the employee contact information for some 16,500 employees statewide at one of the defendant’s stores by first showing his claim of wage and hour violations had some merit.

Instead, the California Supreme Court said companywide contact information must be provided at the onset of the litigation in either a PAGA or wage and hour class action before any determination of merit or before any class certification.

The Court gave only two concessions to employers’ concerns over privacy and misuse of the information. First, the Court adopted a long-standing lower court decision, Belaire-West Landscape, Inc. v. Superior Court, 149 Cal App.4th 554 (2007) which allows employers to first notify the affected employees of the potential release of their individual contact information and provide them with an opportunity to opt out (as opposed to opt in) the release of that information.

Second, the Court endorsed a court “prohibiting disclosure of any received contact information outside the confines of a specific lawsuit.”

The Court rejected any burden on the employer to produce these lists, saying with computer databases, the cost of providing information for 10,000 employees “might prove little different than for 1,000 or 100.”

However, the Court’s opinion [Link] strongly endorsed liberal discovery at the onset of these employment lawsuits, saying it promoted the discovery of new violations in addition to finding evidence supporting those violations alleged in the existing complaint.

Today’s decision gives tremendous leverage to plaintiff’s counsel in both PAGA and wage and hour class actions to use this discovery to disrupt relations between employers and employees, even where there are no underlying violations of California labor law. It rejects attempts by California employers to require these plaintiffs to demonstrate some meritorious case first before launching into release of California-wide employee contact information.

This decision highlights, now more than ever, the importance of early intervention in these types of cases and for companies who employ people in California to rigorously ensure their practices comply with California’s web of wage and hour regulations, which are often far different than federal standards.


©2018 Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Subscribe to Publications

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.