Menu

Surtax in Gridlock – The Saga of Hillsborough County’s Transportation Surtax Reaches the Florida Supreme Court

Development   |   Government Law & Consulting   |   February 4, 2020
Download   
Share Page

Four hundred and fifty-six days after it was approved by more than 57% of the Hillsborough County electorate, legal challenges to a county charter amendment that added a 1% sales tax designed to finance the county’s transportation infrastructure and transit service reach the Florida Supreme Court for oral arguments on February 5. There are two cases pending: one challenging the constitutionality of the tax itself, the other challenging the validation of the bond issuance that would be repaid through the new tax proceeds. The constitutionality challenge was brought by one of the county’s elected county commissioners, with the county government being one of the defendants, while the bond validation challenge was brought by both the commissioner and a local resident.

County charters in Florida allow a locality to create its own form of “local constitution” that gives all “powers of self-government not inconsistent with general law,” pursuant to the Florida Constitution. In this case, the sides differ on whether the charter amendment, after the trial court’s determination, conflicts with chapter 212 of the Florida Statutes. In recent years, the Florida Legislature has been much more active in preempting local government actions through state legislation, so this case has the potential to further define the powers of local government in Florida, as well as locally impacting Hillsborough County’s transportation plans.

At the trial level, the sales tax survived, but some of the provisions included in the voter-approved county charter amendment were stricken by the court. The Second District Court of Appeal deemed the matter to be of great public importance and therefore certified the appeal of the trial court’s ruling on constitutionality to the Florida Supreme Court, where it joined the directly appealed bond validation case. In September 2019, the Florida Supreme Court set a briefing schedule and picked February 5, 2020, as the date for oral arguments.

Since September 2019, the local sales tax referendum has attracted statewide attention. Amicus briefs were filed by the Florida House of Representatives, the Florida Senate, and Associated Industries of Florida supporting the challengers; and by the Greater Tampa Chamber of Commerce, the Tampa Bay Partnership, and the Tampa Hillsborough Economic Development Corporation supporting the local governments.

The arguments on appeal center on whether the trial court properly severed provisions of the charter amendment that it determined were unconstitutional while retaining the remainder. The challengers argue that the entire ballot measure conflicted with the state’s general law that permits counties to institute a transportation surtax. The defenders, including the county and local city governments, argue that the charter amendment accomplished its overall purposes, even with some provisions stricken.

Carlton Fields’ Government Law and Consulting Practice, along with the firm’s Development Industry Group, routinely work on transportation, preemption, and other state and local government issues. Please feel free to reach out to any member of our team to discuss how this Hillsborough case may affect communities and businesses throughout Florida.


©2020 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Subscribe to Publications

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.