Online payday loans can result in an array of "steep, hidden costs" for borrowers, according to the latest payday loan report from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The report precedes potential new regulatory scrutiny of payday lenders by the CFPB.
A payday loan is a short-term loan typically due, at least initially, on the borrower’s next payday. Using data from an 18-month period in 2011 and 2012 from 330 online payday lenders, the CFPB found that half of online borrowers are charged an average of $185 in bank-related penalties for failed debits when the lender attempts to collect payments from the borrower’s account. More than one third of online borrowers who were hit with a bank penalty ended up losing their account, the report noted, with the closures usually occurring within 90 days of the first non-sufficient funds transaction.
Lenders’ repeated payment requests—often done electronically through the borrower’s depository institution—typically failed to result in collection of payments from the borrower. When lenders made multiple payment requests on the same day, the payment requests typically all succeeded (76 percent) or all failed (21 percent), the report found. Only 3 percent of same-day payment requests resulted in at least one successful payment, suggesting that same-day payment requests rarely result in a successful second debit from the borrower’s account and might often end with the borrower paying additional penalties when the account lacked sufficient funds.
The payday lending report is the third from the CFPB since it began supervising payday lenders in January 2012. The report preceded the CFPB’s June 2, 2016 announcement of a proposed new rule that would, among other things, make it an abusive and unfair practice to give a payday loan without first reasonably determining that the consumer will be able to repay the loan and still meet other financial obligations like basic living expenses. The proposed rule is sure to face legislatively scrutiny. The House Appropriations Committee recently adopted a bill and amendment designed to stop the CFPB from finalizing or enforcing the rule until the CFPB submits a consumer impact report.
©2026 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.
