NAIC Working Group Begins Sculpting a Framework to Assess Third-Party Data and Models

After taking a brief hiatus since the 2024 Fall National Meeting, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners’ Third-Party Data and Models (H) Working Group began shaping its focus. Based on a regulatory survey of current state frameworks, issues to be solved, and the definition of “third party,” the group began developing a framework to assess third-party data and models. This framework would address the following problems:

• The inability to assess the fairness of insurers’ data and model use, including potential unfair discrimination and verification of model outputs.
• Limited governance and oversight of how third-party models and data are tested, controlled, and monitored.
• The inability to determine whether rates are excessive, inadequate, or unfairly discriminatory when third-party models or data are used.

To model the sculpture, the group is working to define “third party” and intends to use existing NAIC definitions as a point of reference. The group also received input from regulators and interested parties. For its August 13 meeting, the working group assembled the input received on:

• Who should be included in or excluded from the definition of a third-party vendor.
• The functions data providers serve.
• What should be included in or excluded from the definition of third-party data.
• Whether the definitions apply to specific insurers or all insurers.

Which insurer operations should be included and excluded. With this input, the working group hopes to create a maquette — working definitions for its framework.

This article was co-authored by Carlton Fields law clerk Jake Heiges.

©2026 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.