SEC Now May Consider a Simultaneous Settlement Offer and Waiver Request

Certain “bad actors” who settle with the SEC may be subject to automatic disqualifications or collateral consequences under federal securities laws and regulations. The Commission, however, may grant a settling party’s request for a waiver, which is often preceded by a lengthy process wherein one or more of the SEC’s divisions recommend a full or conditional grant, or a denial, of the waiver.

The Commission generally has considered offers of settlement distinct from waiver requests, subject to separate Commission votes at different times. This bifurcated process left a settling party in an uncertain position because the Commission could accept a settlement, which triggered a disqualification, in advance of its decision on the requested waiver. Then, if the Commission denied the waiver, the settling party could be subject to crippling consequences (e.g., a bar, an injunction, or the retention of an independent compliance consultant), with little to no recourse.

Previously, the SEC had appeared to take a harder line in granting these waivers. For example, the commissioners had been giving more attention to waiver requests (rather than allowing staff members to make the decisions), including imposing additional conditions on some waivers. See “Can ‘Bad Actors’ Wave Goodbye to SEC Waivers?” Expect Focus — Life Insurance, Vol. II (Spring 2015). In July 2019, however, SEC Chairman Jay Clayton announced that a settling party may now request that the Commission consider an offer of settlement that includes a simultaneous waiver (negotiated with the relevant divisions) in a single recommendation from the enforcement staff. So, where appropriate, the Commission now jointly considers offers of settlement with waiver requests in a single vote.

Chairman Clayton’s statement may speed up the settlement process and provide settling parties with more certainty regarding the waiver process. Although the Commission is not obligated to approve either the offer of settlement or the waiver, settling parties will now have the opportunity to consider how — or whether — to proceed with a settlement if their waiver request is denied.

©2026 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.