We previously warned that some individuals involved with arranging EB-5 investments may be required to register as broker-dealers (see "Immigrant Investor Program Raises SEC Broker Registration Issues" in the Summer 2014 Expect Focus and "SEC Charges EB-5 Brokers for Not Registering" in the Summer 2015 Expect Focus).
Now, an SEC administrative law judge has ordered Ireeco LLC and its Hong Kong-based parent to disgorge $3.2 million in referral fees received in connection with EB-5 investments. This is the first sanction the SEC has imposed for failing to register as a broker-dealer in such circumstances.
Importantly, the judge declined the SEC Enforcement Division’s request to impose civil penalties in addition to the disgorgement, stating that Ireeco had not deliberately or recklessly disregarded a regulatory requirement. The decision emphasized that, until the SEC charged Ireeco last summer, no firm or individual had been charged with failure to register as a broker-dealer in connection with EB-5 investments.
The decision also noted:
-
Ireeco had not engaged in fraud, deceit, or manipulation;
-
There was no evidence that the violations caused harm or injury to any investor; and
-
Ireeco is insolvent and therefore unlikely to pay either the disgorgement or any additional civil penalty.
This decision is a clear warning that, going forward, parties who engage in broker activities in connection with EB-5 investments without first registering as broker-dealers are likely to face sanctions beyond mere disgorgement, especially if, unlike Ireeco, they are solvent and able to pay. The decision also warns that, although fraud or harm to investors are not prerequisites to severe sanctions, they will probably be considered exacerbating factors.
©2026 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.
