On May 25, 2017, the SEC stayed a May 2 order issued by the Division of Trading and Markets, acting for the SEC pursuant to delegated authority, that would have permitted the listing and trading of shares of the first "quadruple-leveraged" exchange-traded products (ETPs). The stay puts the May 2 order on hold pending review by the SEC. The SEC also gave the public until June 15, 2017, to provide additional comments.
The release announcing the stay did not describe the SEC’s rationale for doing so, but the action follows closely on the heels of the appointment of the SEC’s new chair, Jay Clayton, on May 4, 2017. Whether the stay is an indication of Chair Clayton’s views is unclear.
On June 13, 2017, NYSE Arca, Inc. (Exchange), which had proposed the listing and trading of shares of the ForceShares Daily 4X US Market Futures Long Fund and ForceShares Daily 4X US Market Futures Short Fund (the Funds), filed a comment letter expressing its strong belief that its proposal is consistent with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the SEC should affirm the May 2 order. In support, the Exchange asserted that concerns about the complexity and risks associated with inverse and leveraged ETPs are "appropriately addressed" by extensive risk disclosures provided by the Funds. The Exchange also asserted that sales of Fund shares would be subject to extensive sales practice obligations, and that trading in Fund shares would be subject to surveillance both by the Exchange as well as FINRA.
Notwithstanding the stay, on July 31, 2017, the Exchange filed a proposal seeking permission to list four ProShares quadruple-leveraged exchange-traded funds.
As of this writing, the SEC has not removed the stay of the May 2 order or acted on the ProShares proposal.
©2026 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.
