Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

Skip to Content

Real Property & Title Insurance Update: Week Ending January 13, 2017

REAL PROPERTY UPDATE

  • Foreclosure: where a valid mortgage properly encumbers the subject property, an incorrect deed and a reformation of deed count are not fatal to a foreclosure action - Heartwood 2, LLC v. Dori, Case No. 3D15-2576  (Fla. 3d DCA January 11, 2017) (reversed and remanded).
  • Affirmative Defenses: where tenant raised affirmative defenses to enforcement of lease action, and landlord failed to reply to said affirmative defenses, landlord’s affidavit in support of summary judgment was insufficient where it failed to factually refute the affirmative defenses - Genuinely Loving Childcare, LLC v. Bre Mariner Conway Crossings, LLC, Case No. 5D15-4168 (Fla. 5th DCA January 13, 2017) (Reversed in part, affirmed in part).

TITLE INSURANCE UPDATE

  • Exclusion: mortgagee’s loss under title insurance policy properly denied because such loss was “created, suffered, assumed or agreed to” by the insured, where mortgagee wired funds to escrow account for attorney for borrowers with instructions to perform certain duties on its behalf as settlement agent and agent misappropriated funds – Plaza Home Mortgage, Inc. v. Fidelity Nat’l Title Ins. Co., Case No. 2015-00930, Dec. 28, 2016, __ N.Y.S.3d __ (N.Y. App. Div.) (affirming summary judgment).
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.