Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

Skip to Content

Real Property, Financial Services, & Title Insurance Update: Week Ending June 7, 2019

Real Property Update

  • Foreclosure / Standing: owner of property subject to mortgage at the time the complaint and lis pendens were filed had standing to dispute legal sufficiency of proof of amount due where owner was named as a defendant, even though owner was not party to the note or mortgage - Green Emerald Homes, LLC v. 21st Mortg. Corp., No. 2D17-2192 (Fla. 2d DCA June 7, 2019) (reversing and remanding involuntary dismissal)
  • Foreclosure / Jury Trial Waiver: loan servicer, which was also the holder of note and loan owner's agent, had sufficient legal basis to enforce jury trial waiver provision of mortgage - Goodenow v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC, No. 3D18-1480 (Fla. 3d DCA June 5, 2019) (affirming final judgment of foreclosure)
  • Foreclosure / Standing / Indispensable Party: non-party in trial court was a "stranger to the record" and therefore lacked standing to appeal; trial court properly rejected argument, made for the first time at trial, that bank failed to join a trust as an indispensable party where the only evidence was the borrower's own conclusory testimony that the property was placed in the trust - Turkell-White v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 4D18-1402 (Fla. 4th DCA June 5, 2019) (dismissing in part, affirming in part)
  • Attorney's Fees / Costs: borrower preserved argument to tax costs when he specifically mentioned Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420 in his motion to tax costs after trial court entered order of involuntary dismissal - Fassy v. Bank of New York Mellon, No. 4D18-1548 (Fla. 4th DCA June 5, 2019) (affirming in part, reversing in part)
  • Foreclosure / Payment History: bank was not required to enter into evidence entire payment history in order to proceed with foreclosure action; span of payment history required will depend on damages sought - Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas, as Trustee v. JB Invs. Realty, LLC, No. 4D18-3240 (Fla. 4th DCA June 5, 2019) (reversing and remanding)

Financial Services Update

  • FDCPA / 1692d / Harassing Conduct: filing of lawsuit on underlying debt is not harassment - Middlebrooks v. Sacor Fin'l, Inc., No. 18-13770 (11th Cir. May 30, 2019) (affirming entry of summary judgment)
  • TILA / Refinancing: a loan modification is not "refinancing" that renews TILA statute of limitations - Lucore v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 3:18-cv-02382-L-MDD (S.D. Cal. June 5, 2019) (granting dismissal motion)

Title Insurance Update

  • Title Insurance Coverage: a restrictive covenant is a title defect covered by the policy, but this covenant was excluded by Section 3(a) because the covenant was specifically disclosed to the insured in the purchase contract - 50 Clarkson Partners LLC v. Old Republic Nat'l Title Ins. Co., No. 516966/18 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. June 3, 2019) (granting dismissal)
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.