Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

Skip to Content

Real Property & Title Insurance Update: Week Ending March 29, 2019

Real Property Update

  • Foreclosure / Attorneys' Fees: borrower not entitled to attorneys' fees for prevailing on lender's claim for reformation of mortgage, where lender prevailed on claim of foreclosure without reformation - Deutsche Bank, Nat. Trust Co. v. Quintela, No. 4D18-873 (Fla. 4th DCA Mar. 27, 2019) (reversed)
  • UCC / Promissory Note: adjustable rate and amortization provisions in note did not render it non-negotiable - Hanna v. Pennymac Holdings, LLC, No. 4D18-1400 (Fla. 4th DCA Mar. 27, 2019)
  • Inverse Condemnation: four-year statute of limitations for inverse condemnation action starts to run when the owner is denied the economic use or benefit of the subject property, and not when the owner discovers the monetary damages resulting from the taking. Campbell v State of Florida, Dept. Of Transportation, No. 1D-18283 (Fla. 1st DCA Mar. 28, 2019) (affirmed)

Title Insurance Update

  • Equitable Subrogation: New York's six year statute of limitation on counterclaim for equitable subrogation that relates to a mortgage foreclosure begins to run when the borrower defaults on the first mortgage - Patmos Fifth Real Estate Inc. v. Mazl Building LLC, No. 8377N, 108421/11 (N.Y. App. Feb. 7, 2019) (affirming order denying motion to amend counterclaim)
  • Equitable Subrogation: lender not entitled to foreclose its mortgage against borrower's spouse who did not sign mortgage, but is entitled to equitable lien in the amount of loan proceeds used to pay off a prior lien, less the amount of payments used pay the lender's mortgage - Crawford v. Fed. Nat'l. Mortg. Ass'n., No. 5D17-3027 (Fla. 5th DCA Mar. 22, 2019) (affirming in part and reversing in part final judgment after bench trial and remanding with instructions)
  • Coverage: trial court erred in determining as a matter of law that title insurance policy does not provide coverage for unrecorded plat created prior to conveyance of insured lot described in prior, recorded plat and that unrecorded plat constitutes a defect in title - Loflin v. BMP Development, LP, No. 2016-001840 (S.C. App. Mar. 27, 2019) (reversing and remanding order granting motion for summary judgment)
  • Statute of Limitations: 20 year statute of limitations applies to breach of title insurance policy claim per South Carolina statute of limitations as to sealed instruments - Loflin v. BMP Development, LP, No. 2016-001840 (S.C. App. Mar. 27, 2019) (reversing and remanding order granting motion for summary judgment)
  • Marketability: title insurance covers marketability of title, not marketability of land, and if insured holds perfect title to valueless land there is no claim on the policy - N. Cal. Cmty. Dev. Corp. v. First Am. Title Ins., No. C084779 (Cal. App. Mar. 28, 2019) (affirming order granting summary judgment)
  • Exclusion 3(a): claim that arises out of an agreement entered into by the insured is not covered because the agreement was "created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to" by the insured and excluded by the policy, even if the agreement recites pre-agreement claims to title to the property that are subsumed within the agreement - 3 West 16th St., LLC v. Commonwealth Land Title Ins. Co., No. 18-Civ.-1914 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 28, 2019) (order adopting report and recommendation)
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.