Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

Skip to Content

Real Property, Financial Services, & Title Insurance Update: Week Ending August 21, 2020

Real Property Update

  • Foreclosure Sale / Challenge: borrower failed to meet his burden of establishing that gross inadequacy of foreclosure bid price resulted from "mistake, fraud or other irregularity" in the sale - Venezia v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 3D19-1869 (Fla. 3d DCA Aug. 19, 2020) (affirming denial of motion to vacate foreclosure sale)
  • Foreclosure / Extinguishing Interests: where it was undisputed that subsequent mortgagee's predecessor in interest was an alter ego of original owner and mortgagor, rebuttable presumption existed that original mortgagor had unlawfully intended to defeat subordinate interests - Koyfman v. 1572 Pledger LLC, No. 3D19-1521 (Fla. 3d DCA Aug. 19, 2020) (reversing foreclosure judgment and denial of counterclaim to quiet title)

Financial Services Update

  • FDCPA & FCCPA / Sovereign Immunity: claims against United States barred by sovereign immunity because Congress has not waived sovereign immunity under the FDCPA or Florida statutory law - Sole v. Devos, No. 8:19-cv-3114-T-60JSS (M.D. Fla. Aug. 20, 2020)
  • FCRA: plaintiff did not submit sufficient evidence to establish that defendant lacked reasonable procedures to avoid violation of FCRA, because the violation plaintiff has established arose from defendant's incorrect interpretation of the FCRA, rather than any failure to maintain reasonable procedures for reporting information - Moran v. The Screening Pros, LLC, No. 2:12-cv-05808-SVW-AGR (C.D. Cal. July 30, 2020) (granting summary judgment in defendant's favor)
  • TILA: plaintiff provided no authority for the proposition that only the organization servicing a loan may act as a lender's agent in providing TILA notice of a change in ownership - Gordon v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n, No. 18-10075-DMG (PLAx) (C.D. Cal. July 21, 2020) (granting summary judgment in defendants' favor)

Title Insurance Update

  • Closing Agent Liability / Negligence: borrower's negligence claim against closing agent for failure to issue a title insurance policy without exclusions for mechanic's liens and for failure to follow closing instructions failed because the mechanic's liens were post policy and would have been excluded even if such a policy had been issued and because the borrower had no written closing instructions so as to come within the scope of the closing protection letter - Johnson v. U.S. Title Agency, Inc., No. 108547 (Ohio Ct. App. Aug. 13, 2020) (affirming trial court's directed verdict on borrower's negligence claim)
  • Duty to Defend / Land Not Covered: title insurer has no duty to defend insured against adjoining landowner's to own or have an easement over a strip of property lessed out of insured's legal description in its deed and title insurance policy - Rabinowitz v. Chicago Title Ins. Co., No. 52898-30II (Wash. Ct. App. Aug. 18, 2020) (affirming grant of summary judgment in favor of title insurer)
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.