Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

Skip to Content

Real Property, Financial Services, & Title Insurance Update: Week Ending January 29, 2021

Real Property Update

  • Foreclosure / Retrieval of Original Note & Mortgage: Assignee and substituted plaintiff lender in dismissed foreclosure action was authorized to retrieve the original note and mortgage from the court's file - MTGLQ Invs., L.P. v. Merrill, No. 1D19-2682 (Fla. 1st DCA Jan. 25, 2021) (reversed and remanded)

Financial Services Update

  • FDCPA & FCCPA / Indirect Liability / False Misrepresentations: Defendant could not be held liable for alleged false representations that another entity made while acting on defendant's behalf because plaintiff had not presented any evidence to suggest that defendant was aware of, or had any control over, the display of the representations - Rivas v. Midland Funding, LLC, No. 19-13383 (11th Cir. Jan 27, 2021) (affirming summary judgment)
  • FCRA / Willful Violation: Defendant did not willfully violate the FCRA because, although defendant may have willfully chosen not to pursue particular lines of investigation, this did not show, as a matter of law, that defendant willfully disregarded its statutory duties to conduct a reasonable investigation - Romero v. Monterey Fin. Servs., LLC, No. 3:19-cv-01781 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2021) (granting in part furnisher's summary judgment motion)
  • FDCPA / Debt Collection Letter: Plaintiff could not establish its FDCPA claim that collection letter failed to properly identify creditor because the letter implicitly made clear who the current creditor was - Chiofalo v. Forster & Garbus, LLP, No. 2:19-cv-00487 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 25, 2021) (granting defendants' summary judgment motion)

Title Insurance Update

  • Fraudulent Joinder: Plaintiff did not fraudulently join local title agent in hopes of defeating diversity jurisdiction where it is highly unlikely, but still possible, that a Nevada state court could find that plaintiff states a cause of action against the title agent - U.S. Bank Tr. Nat'l Ass'n v. Fidelity Nat'l Title Grp., Inc., No. 2:20-cv-02068 (D. Nev. Jan. 22, 2021) (order granting motion to remand)
  • Motion to Remand / Snap Removal: Title insurer's removal was improper because it occurred before any defendant had been served - U.S. Bank Tr. Nat'l Ass'n v. Fidelity Nat'l Title Grp., Inc., No. 2:20-cv-02068 (D. Nev. Jan. 22, 2021) (order granting motion to remand)
  • Remand / Motion for Attorneys' Fees & Costs: Insured was not entitled to attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) where defendant had an objectively reasonable basis for seeking removal because the Ninth Circuit has yet to rule on snap removal and there is persuasive authority supporting the tactic - U.S. Bank Tr. Nat'l Ass'n v. Fidelity Nat'l Title Grp., Inc., No. 2:20-cv-02068 (D. Nev. Jan. 22, 2021) (order denying motion for attorneys' fees and costs)
  • Duty to Defend: Title insurer did not have a duty to defend insureds against trespass claims excluded from coverage under the title policy - Safeco Ins. Co. of Am. v. Fidelity Nat'l Title Ins. Co., No. 3:19-cv-05902 (W.D. Wash. Jan. 26, 2021) (order denying plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granting defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment)
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.