Menu

Real Property, Financial Services, & Title Insurance Update: Week Ending October 18, 2019

Real Property Litigation   |   Consumer Finance   |   Title Insurance   |   October 30, 2019
Download Download   
Share Share Page

Real Property Update

  • Foreclosure / Statute of Limitations: default notice pursuant to paragraph 22 of subject mortgage may include amounts accrued outside five-year statute of limitations U.S. Bank, Nat’l Ass’n v. Sturm, No. 2D18-757 (Fla. 2d DCA Oct. 16, 2019) (reversed and remanded)
  • Class Action: an order denying certification of a class action counterclaim in a foreclosure case, which fails to include findings upon which the ruling was based, is contrary to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.220(d)(1) and is immediately appealable Cabrera v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n, No. 4D18-3537 (Fla. 4th DCA Oct. 16, 2019) (reversed)

Financial Services Update

  • FCCPA: Florida’s workers’ compensation law does not preclude trial court’s jurisdiction over a consumer’s claims against her workers’ compensation medical providers for violation of the FCCPA Davis v. Sheridan Healthcare, Inc., Nos. 2D17-829, 2D17-1790 (Fla. 2d DCA Oct. 16, 2019)
  • FCRA / Standing: plaintiff lacks Article III standing to pursue Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) claim where plaintiff alleges only a technical violation of the FCRA without any accompanying concrete harm associated with screening company performing background check on plaintiff without obtaining certification from employer that employee authorized such background check pursuant to the FCRA Fifer v. ADP Screening & Selection Servs., Inc., No. 5:19-cv-03174 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2019) (granting motion to remand)
  • FDCPA: court denied, in part, motion to dismiss student loan debtors’ claims alleging that student loan trusts, student loan servicer, and law firm retained by the trusts deployed fraudulent scheme to obtain default judgments in state court against debtors in order to recover payment of student loans described as “unprovable debts” Michelo v. Nat’l Collegiate Student Loan Tr. 2007-2, No. 1:18-cv-01781 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 11, 2019) 

Title Insurance Update

  • Title Defects: concluding that recorded easements and use restrictions that were omitted from chain of title report and were not listed as exclusion in title policy constituted title defects, which triggered covered loss under title policy  Old Republic Nat’l Title Ins. Co. v. RM Kids, LLC, No. A19A0971 (Ga. Ct. App. Oct. 17, 2019) (affirming denial of motion for directed verdict)


©2020 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Subscribe to Publications

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.