Menu

Real Property, Financial Services, & Title Insurance Update: Week Ending November 6, 2020

Real Property Litigation   |   Consumer Finance   |   Title Insurance   |   November 6, 2020
Download Download   
Share Share Page

Real Property Update

  • Easement Appurtenant: easement was presumptively appurtenant (held to run with the land) because (i) it was not terminable except by agreement executed by both parties with formalities of a deed, (ii) there was no evidence to show either party intended the right to be personal and terminable at the will of either party or upon the death of either party – Devino v. 2436 E. Las Olas, LLC, No. 4D19-1931 (Fla. 4th DCA Nov. 4, 2020) (affirmed) 
  • Foreclosure / Support for Amount of Damages: award of costs and interest was stricken for lack of evidentiary support, but further proceedings were not required or appropriate because amount of damages was well-supported – JB Investment Realty, LLC v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust Co. Americas, as Trustee, No. 4D19-3380 (Fla. 4th DCA Nov. 4, 2020) (affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded) 
  • Mechanics Lien: contract could use the “last known address” of the owner to effect service of mechanics lien under statute, but summary judgment was improper because the “last known address” and whether the owner suffered prejudice for failing to receive notice of the claim of lien presented questions of fact – Fettig’s Constr., Inc. v. Paradise Properties & Interiors LLC, No. 4D20-133 (Fla. 4th DCA Nov. 4, 2020) (granting petition with direction to quash partial final judgment)

Financial Services Update

  • FDCPA / Bona Fide Error Defense: debt collector cannot invoke bona fide error defense by requiring creditor-clients to provide only accurate information – Urbina v. National Business Factors Inc., No. 19-16055 (9th Cir. Nov. 5, 2020)
  • FDCPA / Unauthorized Fee: FDCPA precludes charges not expressly authorized by underlying agreement, including convenience fees for payments – Lembeck v. Arvest Central Mortg. Co., No. 20-cv-03277-VC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 3 , 2020)
  • FDCPA / Disclosure: a communication “overshadows or contradicts the validation notice if it would make the least sophisticated consumer uncertain as to her rights” – Mizrachi v. Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker LLP, No. 20-91-cv (2d Cir. Nov. 5, 2020) (unpublished opinion) (quoting Ellis v. Solomon & Solomon, P.C., 591 F.3d 130, 134 (2d Cir. 2010)) (reversing dismissal)

Title Insurance Update

  • Loss / Expert Testimony: title insurance company’s motion to exclude the testimony of insured’s expert on the ground that expert’s cost-basis methodology is not permitted by Section 7(a)(iii) of the policy, which allows only diminution in value methodology, is an improper challenge under Rule 702 and better suited for summary judgment – Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co., No. 2:19-cv-00285 (D. Utah Nov. 3, 2020) (memorandum decision and order)
  • Covered Risks / Right to Drainage: dispute with neighbor over design of insured’s property resulting in flooding of neighbor’s property not within the scope of title insurance policy’s covered risks – Batstone v. Chicago Title Ins. Co., No. RDB-20-00937 (D. Md. Nov. 2, 2020) (memorandum opinion granting motion for summary judgment)


©2022 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Subscribe to Publications

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.