According to the court, Ironshore plausibly alleged that Conemaugh Health Systems Inc. breached its obligation to cooperate with Ironshore, and didn’t disclose circumstances that gave rise to the underlying claim on its application for the Ironshore excess policy.
Gidus advises that the case is a reminder to policyholders that their duty to cooperate does not end with their primary insurers, and that they should keep all carriers, including excess carriers, aware of significant developments in litigation.
Gidus also notes that the decision demonstrates the importance of reserving the right to recoup indemnity paid under Pennsylvania law.
Read the article.
©2026 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.
Related Capabilities
Related People
Media Contact
- Senior Public Relations and Communications Manager
