The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has held that the inadvertent failure to record arbitration proceedings did not warrant vacating the arbitration award. The court thus affirmed confirmation of the award.
Salah Uddin and TD Ameritrade Inc. arbitrated a dispute before the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. The arbitration agreement provided that the arbitration was supposed to be recorded, but the arbitrators inadvertently forgot to record the proceedings. Uddin claimed that the arbitrators interrupted, rushed, and pressured him. He sought to vacate the award, but the district court denied his request and instead granted TD Ameritrade’s motion to confirm.
The Ninth Circuit affirmed. It rejected Uddin’s argument that the failure to record the proceedings constituted “misbehavior.” The court alternatively held that even if the failure to record the arbitration amounted to misbehavior, Uddin had not shown prejudice due to the lack of a recording or transcript. It noted that arbitrators need not explain their reasoning. The Ninth Circuit rejected Uddin’s arguments about arbitrators purportedly interrupting, rushing, and pressuring him by noting that those contentions were “insufficient to show that the arbitrators exceeded the bounds of efficient management of the hearing and instead behaved in a fundamentally unfair manner that prejudiced Uddin’s ability to present his case.” The court also held that “the absence of a recording or transcript is not alone sufficient to establish that the arbitrators ignored applicable law.” The court therefore affirmed the confirmation.
Uddin v. TD Ameritrade, Inc., No. 24-5073 (9th Cir. Apr. 13, 2026).
©2026 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.
Perspectives on reinsurance and arbitration law and practice.
Recent Posts
Editorial Contacts
Shareholder
Shareholder
Of Counsel
Shareholder
Shareholder
