Energy and Utilities



The firm's energy lawyers provide a wide range of legal services to energy-related companies and public authorities, including electric and natural gas firms. We provide counseling and advice and represent such firms before state regulatory agencies, state and federal courts, and arbitration panels.

  • Siting, Permitting, and Obtaining State Leases For Linear Facilities
    Our lawyers have experience representing companies seeking to site linear facilities in the state of Florida. Representative matters include:
    • Represented owners of linear facilities such as gas pipelines, helping them obtain state leases and permits for their facilities, which included subaqueous facilities. 
    • Represented LNG gas supplier in all aspects of state, local, and federal permitting of pipeline, including its submerged and terrestrial portions.
  • Contract Negotiations

    Our energy lawyers have extensive experience in negotiating a broad array of contracts on behalf of its energy clients. 

  • Environmental Permitting
    We provide environmental permitting counsel regarding new construction and ongoing maintenance activities, applying both state and federal environmental laws including state power plant siting acts; the Clean Air Act; the Clean Water Act; federal and state wetlands, tidelands, and river protection acts; the Endangered Species Act; and pollution and hazardous waste requirements.
  • Project Development
    Our power plant project development work includes negotiation of power purchase agreements, development stage analysis, facility siting, environmental and labor issues, project finance, EPC contracting, and downstream operations.
  • Development of Regulatory Strategy
    As our clients weigh their roles in a competitive energy environment, we help them to evaluate tax consequences, develop strategies designed to ensure the viability of rural electric cooperatives, and consider new opportunities for power brokers/ marketers.
  • Legislative Lobbying
    The firm’s government law practice assists its energy-related clients that require legislative representation.
  • Labor and Employment
    We help resolve disputes related to construction defects, property damage, personal injury, breach of contract, and worker safety under OSHA.
  • Tax Matters
    Our tax attorneys assist utility/energy entities in the areas of state sales taxes, and ad valorem taxes.


  • Provided advice to subcontractor during construction of the Glatfelter Cogeneration Project involving paper-manufacturing process for private owner. Assisted in claim preparation and instituted litigation in dispute with design-build contractor.
  • Represented contractor on successful claims resolution with the U.S. government on construction of power transmission towers and lines in Haditha, Baiji, and al-Qaim.
  • Represented engineer in lawsuit with owner on West Virginia hydroelectric project (Omega II joint venture).
  • ​Contract drafting of project development agreement for planning, designing, constructing, owning, and operating interstate natural gas pipeline system for the Portland National Gas Transmission System.
  • Provided ongoing counsel to the Orlando Utilities Commission in the successful negotiated resolution of approximately $30 million in construction claims at the Stanton Energy Center. The contract was a multiple prime with construction management and fast-track design.
  • Represented general contractor for Washington, D.C., Virginia, and greater Baltimore in arbitration with trench and bore subcontractor.
  • Represented pipeline contractor in successful jury trial in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.

  • Represented utility in FPSC prudence review proceeding arising out of nuclear containment building delamination during steam generator replacement project at nuclear powered generating facility 
  • Defended contract claims in federal and state litigation involving waste to energy management agreements. 
  • Handled “full requirements” electric utility rates cases before the FPSC including a two-week full requirements rate case evidentiary hearing. 
  • Prosecuted utility claims for, and recovery of, hundreds of millions of dollars in preconstruction and carrying costs for the development of two nuclear power plants in annual nuclear cost recovery evidentiary proceedings. 
  • Prosecuted utility claims for, and recovery of, hundreds of millions of dollars incurred to prepare for, respond to, and recover from the 2004 hurricanes (storm cost recovery proceedings).
  • Defended electric utility against claim for $143 million refund for allegedly imprudent coal procurement decisions in proceeding resulting in four-day evidentiary hearing.
  • Obtained determinations of need for three state-of-the-art, combined-cycle electric power plants in three separate need determination proceedings and for the expansion of a nuclear facility due to the largest power uprate in the state.
  • Obtained determination of need for two advanced design nuclear power plants through a week-long evidentiary hearing.
  • Defended lawsuits brought by various individuals, local governments, and conservation groups opposing the siting and construction of a major electric transmission line.
  • Prosecuted lawsuits to invalidate local government efforts to alter the route of, or prevent construction of, transmission lines.
  • Represented owner-utility in major construction litigation and product defect litigation over a nuclear powered generating facility.
  • Represented utility in major FPSC prudence review proceedings arising out of operational outages of a nuclear powered generating facility.
  • Defended litigation in which local governments sought to compel electric utilities to place all electric distribution lines underground at utility expense.
  • Litigation involving electric utility disputes with cogenerator operators.
  • Represented retail load serving electric utility in several contested cases before the FPSC, and ultimately in the Florida Supreme Court, involving efforts by “merchant” plant developers to site plants in Florida.
  • Advocated utility positions in an FPSC workshop concerning possible modifications to the FPSC’s bidding rule.
  • Represented utility interests in investigation into adequacy of reserve margins in Florida.
  • Defended court actions by municipalities regarding disputes over franchise agreements with the public utility.
  • Represented public utility and affiliated telecommunications company in class action litigation over the right to use electric utility transmission line easements for telecommunications purposes.
  • Handled numerous, multi-week arbitration proceedings to establish value of electric utility distribution systems; and entitlement to, and amount of, “stranded costs” associated with the sale of such facilities under FERC Order No. 888.
  • Defended breach of contract and other claims by cogeneration facilities on behalf of public utility.


The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.