Menu

Antitrust and Trade Regulation


Overview

Carlton Fields’ global antitrust group represents businesses and individuals in civil and criminal antitrust matters in courts, administrative agencies, and other proceedings and investigations around the world. Our team includes four board certified antitrust lawyers, a leading white collar crime and investigations practitioner, and several former Fortune 1000 company senior executives. We take innovative approaches to bet-the-company antitrust matters, and have obtained landmark decisions that helped shape the law. Our practice covers the full range of substantive antitrust and competition law issues, including defense of civil litigation and government investigations, criminal grand jury investigations and trials, merger and acquisition representation, and counseling and compliance program administration. 
 
For example, we: 
 

  • Represented a pharmaceutical company in an antitrust tying case that involved process patent rights and a branded drug; 
  • Represented a manufacturer of chemical products in a nationwide price-fixing class action; Obtained decision denying class certification; 
  • Represented a major auto insurer against tying and restraint of trade claims brought on behalf of a national class of 70 million policyholders who claimed they were overcharged for aftermarket crash parts;
  • Represented a manufacturer of fax paper in a state court indirect-purchaser action; Defeated class certification in first decision of its kind in Florida; 
  • Helped a national franchiser reorganize its supply chain and institute creative distribution and marketing programs; 
  • Defended a large health care conglomerate in commercial litigation alleging monopolization, group boycott, exclusive dealing, and merger-challenge claims brought by an alleged competitor;
  • Represented an international appliance manufacturer in its acquisition of a competing vacuum business, including premerger notification compliance under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act; Defended multiple challenges by, and obtained approval from, federal and state enforcement authorities; 
  • Defended an international photographic media manufacturer in a California indirect purchaser antitrust class action alleging conspiracy to exclude a competitor and price-fixing; 
  • Counsel clients on various other non-public antitrust and competition law issues, including defense and counseling on mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures, business structure and distribution agreements (such as resale price maintenance and similar issues), antitrust compliance program design and implementation, and government investigations. 
 
We are also one of a handful of law firms worldwide that has an antitrust sub-group dedicated exclusively to pursuing antitrust recovery opportunities for corporate clients. Our “cartel recovery group” has revolutionized the concept of affirmative recovery, often achieving, through negotiation, arbitration, and litigation, recoveries that are many multiples greater than those available through the class mechanism. We have recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for corporate clients in price-fixing lawsuits and pre-lawsuit settlements (focusing on both monetary and business-solution settlements), and we are at the forefront of many of the burgeoning legal issues in the antitrust world.  
 
For example:  
 
  • We represented several computer manufacturers and mobile phone companies in actions to recover damages from an international price-fixing cartel in the flat-panel liquid crystal display (LCD) market. We obtained several precedent-setting orders in that case (favorable to our clients) that helped redefine the scope of the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvement Act. (In re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1827 (U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, San Francisco Division)). One of our attorneys was appointed by the federal judge overseeing that case to serve as “liaison counsel” for dozens of “Direct Action Plaintiffs,” giving us a leadership role in coordinating discovery, motion practice, and communications with the court among the hundreds of interested parties in that case. 
  • We represented several power tool companies, health care product manufacturers, computer manufacturers, and telecommunications carriers and equipment manufacturers in opt-out multidistrict commercial litigation to recover damages from an international price-fixing cartel in the lithium ion battery market (In re Lithium Ion Battery Antitrust Litigation, MDL 2420 (U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, Oakland Division)).
  • We represented several large technology companies in opt-out multidistrict commercial litigation to recover damages from an antitrust price-fixing cartel in the optical disk drive market (In re Optical Disk Drive Antitrust Litigation, MDL 2143 (U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, San Francisco Division)), and various related appellate issues in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (In re: Dell Inc., et al v. John Doe(9th Cir. Sept. 10, 2015) (affirming order in clients’ favor requiring production of FBI tapes and establishing Ninth Circuit standard under Criminal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(e)).
 
We have also represented Fortune 1000 clients in: lawsuits and pre-lawsuit negotiations to recover damages from international price-fixing cartels; monopolization claims; group boycotts; and matters related to other anti-competitive conduct in the: 
 
  • mobile handsets market; 
  • the pharmaceuticals market; 
  • the beer, wine, and spirits industries; 
  • the health care market; 
  • the capacitor, resistor, and inductor markets; 
  • the grocery and food distribution industry; 
  • the payment card industry; and 
  • the restaurant industry.

 
In addition, we have represented clients in many other non-public matters. We routinely handle these recovery matters using creative alternative fee arrangements such as contingency, hybrid, flat-fee, and hold-back bonuses, which are tailored to provide budget-certainty, risk-sharing, and minimal financial outlay for our clients.  
 
 

All Insights

More Product Liability and Antitrust Class Actions, Rising Class Action Spending Among Trends in Latest Class Action Survey

More Product Liability and Antitrust Class Actions, Rising Class Action Spending Among Trends in Latest Class Action Survey

April 23, 2018

The seventh annual Carlton Fields Class Action Survey, released April 24, reveals important issues and trends related to class action matters and management based on interviews with general counsel or senior legal officers at 385 companies of all sizes and business types.

Featured Insights

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.