Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

Skip to Content

Eminent Domain

Eminent Domain

Overview

Carlton Fields advises property owners and governmental entities on all aspects of the eminent domain process, including necessary litigation in all state and federal courts.
 
Pre-Suit Negotiation. Carlton Fields assists during the pre-litigation negotiation between the property owner and the governmental entity that precedes all eminent domain cases. Frequently, we help clients resolve these matters before litigation, maximizing value for the property owner and meeting the needs of the governmental entity.
 
Eminent Domain Litigation. If the matter is not resolved prior to litigation, we address entitlement and compensation issues during the judicial process. Compensation often includes the value of the property acquired, as well as severance damages (for partial takings) and business damages (when a business' operation is adversely affected). We often address additional issues associated with condemnation, including nonmonetary benefits, such as improved access, more advantageous zoning, realignment of roadways, and other property enhancements.
 
Inverse Condemnation. Carlton Fields represents clients in inverse condemnation lawsuits, which involve property rights "taken" by governmental action, where the governmental authority does not formally offer the property owner compensation for the taking, as in eminent domain proceedings. These governmental actions may include "downzoning," significantly restricting or obstructing access, flooding, or regulatory takings. In inverse condemnation matters, the property owner is required to initiate litigation in an attempt to have the court rule that the governmental action has in fact resulted in a "taking." If the court finds that a taking occurred, the property owner may seek compensation for the taking. 

Our Team

Key Contacts

Ilan A. Nieuchowicz
Shareholder

Additional Members

H. Ray Allen II
Of Counsel
Tampa
Dane R. Blunt
Shareholder
Tampa
Joel B. Giles
Shareholder
Tampa
Donald E. Hemke
Of Counsel
Tampa
Emil Hirsch
Shareholder
Washington, D.C.
Roger S. Kobert
Shareholder
New York
Dean A. Morande
Shareholder
West Palm Beach
Paul L. Nettleton
Shareholder
Miami
Gary L. Sasso
President and Chief Executive Officer
Tampa
Christopher Smart
Shareholder
Tampa
Kenneth A. Tinkler
Shareholder
Tampa
Paul J. Ullom
Shareholder
Tampa
Henry S. Wulf
Shareholder
West Palm Beach
Gwynne A. Young
Shareholder
Tampa