Jeffrey A. Cohen

Experience

• Earl v. Boeing Co., 53 F.4th 897 (5th Cir. 2022). Amicus curiae brief supporting ultimate result of reversal of certification of class action.
• Von Dyck v. Gavin, 350 So. 3d 842, 843 (Fla. 1st DCA 2022). Secured reversal of judgment of dismissal based upon statute of limitations.
• Fuguet v. Gerker, 5D21-1493, 2022 WL 3206381 (Fla. 5th DCA Aug. 9, 2022). Affirming dismissal with prejudice due to fraud on the court.

• Royal Palm Optical, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., No. 21-11335, 2022 WL 1666967 (11th Cir. May 25, 2022), Affirming dismissal of business interruption class action challenging denial of coverage based on government-imposed COVID-19 restrictions.

• Crime v. Looney, 328 So. 3d 399 (Fla. 1st DCA 2021). Reversing judgment against defendant in personal injury action based upon improper refusal to apportion fault to non-party and remanding for new trial on all issues.
• Watson v. Homeowners Choice Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 317 So. 3d 161 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021). Affirming judgment in favor of insurer due to the plaintiff’s failure to comply with proof-of-loss requirement of insurance policy.
• Shaquille O'Neal v. Darling, 321 So. 3d 309 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021). Reinstating award of attorney’s fees against plaintiff and plaintiff’s counsel for pursuing frivolous lawsuit.
• McKinney v. Graham, 313 So. 3d 867, 868 (Fla. 5th DCA 2021). Reversing multimillion-dollar verdict based on improper introduction of evidence of intoxication and improper exclusion of evidence related to potential bias of treating physician.
• Arko Plumbing Corp. v. Rudd, 299 So. 3d 1053 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020). Affirming summary judgment in case alleging violation of Uniform Trade Secrets Act, defamation and civil conspiracy.
• Fountainbleau, LLC. v. Hire Us, Inc., No. 2D18-4068 (Fla. 2d DCA June 7, 2019). Grant of petition for writ of certiorari alleging lack of personal jurisdiction to order parties to arbitration. Read Order.
• Odom v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 254 So. 3d 268 (Fla. 2018). Discussing standard for remittitur in Engle-progeny action.
• Darling v. Shaquille O'Neal, 247 So. 3d 481 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018). Affirming summary judgment in case alleging invasion of privacy.
• R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Davis, 245 So. 3d 929 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018). Reversing order granting new trial in Engle-progeny action.
• Canta v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., 245 So. 3d 813 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017). Denying petition for certiorari after law firm was disqualified due to imputed conflict.
• Suarez v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 211 So. 3d 1051 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016). Affirming jury verdict, class membership, addiction causation.
• Russo v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., 208 So. 3d 172 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016). Affirming jury verdict, necessity of concurrent cause instruction. 
• R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Calloway, 201 So. 3d 753 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016). Reversing jury verdict; improper closing argument; comparative fault.
• Freeman v. Berrin, 210 So. 3d 1279 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016). Affirming dismissal for failure to prosecute.
• JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. v. Colletti Invs., LLC, 199 So. 3d 395 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016). Reversing judgment for consequential damages.
• Payne v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 606 F. App'x 940 (11th Cir. 2015). Affirming summary judgment and exclusion of expert testimony.
• Crimson Ibis, LLC v. U.S. Bank N.A., 155 So. 3d 357 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014). Affirming decision to vacate final judgment.
• Vital Pharm., Inc. v. Prof'l Supplements, LLC, 114 So. 3d 952 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013). Affirming denial of preliminary injunction.
• Darling v. Shaquille O'Neal, 86 So. 2d 1128 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012). Affirming preliminary injunction prohibiting disclosure of documents.
• Swenson v. Am. Ammunition, Inc., 78 So. 2d 736 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). Affirming summary judgment based on statute of limitations under Louisiana law.
• Minnis v. Ford Motor Co., 75 So. 2d 290 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). Affirming summary judgment in favor of manufacturer in product liability claim.
• Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Laliberte, 52 So. 3d 31 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). Issues concerning admissibility of scientific testing.
• Adams v. Ford Motor Co., 319 F. App'x 113 (3d Cir. 2009). Dismissing appeal and finding collateral order doctrine inapplicable.
• Ford Motor Co. v. Hall-Edwards, 5 So. 3d 786 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009). Granting certiorari and quashing an order permitting the plaintiff to plead punitive damages without providing sufficient notice.
• Ford Motor Co. v. Hall-Edwards, 971 So. 2d 854 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). Reversing jury verdict based on improper admission of other accident evidence and evidence of subsequent remedial measures.
• Kish v. A.W. Chesterton Co., 930 So. 2d 704 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). Affirming summary judgment based on statute of repose on fraud.
• Koulianos v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., 962 So. 2d 357 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). Affirming summary judgment based on statute of repose on fraud.
• Grunow v. Valor Corp. of Fla., 904 So. 2d 551 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). Relationship between product defect and negligence in wrongful death, product liability action arising from murder of a teacher by a student.
• Tran v. Toyota Motor Corp., 420 F.3d 1310 (11th Cir. 2005). Issues concerning definition of design defect and admissibility of other incidents.
• Gen. Motors Corp. v. Porritt, 891 So. 2d 1056 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). Admissibility of demonstrative test and standards for admissibility of expert testimony.
• Hockensmith v. Ford Motor Co., 116 F. App'x 244 (11th Cir. 2004). Issues concerning jury instructions and the admissibility of statistical evidence in a wrongful death action.
• Tableau Fine Art Grp. v. Jacoboni, 853 So. 2d 299 (Fla. 2003). Standard for recusal of trial judge.
• Dourado v. Ford Motor Co., 843 So. 2d 913 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). Admissibility of medical bills in a wrongful death action.
• Williams v. Potamkin Motor Cars, Inc., 835 So. 2d 310 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). Class action requirements and Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act.
• Scheman-Gonzalez v. Saber Mfg. Co., 816 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). Definition of design defect and defect by virtue of the failure to warn.
• Oller v. Ford Motor Co., 265 F.3d 1062 (11th Cir. 2001). Admissibility of expert testimony and definition of design defect.
• D'Amario v. Ford Motor Co., 806 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 2001). The role of comparative fault in a crashworthiness case.
• Jackson v. Gen. Motors Corp., 60 S.W. 3d 800 (Tenn. 2001) (amicus brief). Definition of product defect.
• Ford Motor Co. v. Meyers, 771 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). Attorneys' fees pursuant to offer of judgment.
• Marlin v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 761 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). Issues relating to the relationship between insurers, their insureds, and attorneys retained by insurers representing insureds, and contractual duties owed pursuant to insurance policies.
• Bell Sports, Inc. v. Yarusso, 759 A.2d 582 (Del. 2000). Admissibility of expert testimony and inconsistent verdicts.
• Almeida v. FMC Corp.. 740 So. 2d 557 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). Failure to prosecute.
• Am. First Fed., Inc. v. Lake Forest Park, Inc., 198 F.3d 1259 (11th Cir. 1999). Exhaustion of remedies under the federal Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act (FIRREA) and enforceability of promissory notes.
• Santana v. Reliastar Life Ins. Co., 732 So. 2d 1078 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). Interpleader requirements.
• Goulah v. Ford Motor Co., 118 F.3d 1478 (11th Cir. 1997). Jury instructions, comparative fault, destruction of evidence.
• Ciba-Geigy, Ltd. v. Fish Peddler, Inc., 691 So. 2d 1111 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (amicus brief). Forum non conveniens.
• Jenkins v. Budd Co., 689 So. 2d 426 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). Statute of repose.
• Hoover v. Bell Sports, Inc., 103 F.3d 147 (11th Cir. 1996). Expert testimony.