Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

“Petty” Behavior: Sometimes Overlooking An Opponent’s Technical Violation Is The Best Course Of Action
February 07, 2023

Should an attorney always seek to have an opponent's late-by-a-few-minutes filing stricken in order to pursue the timing issue? No, according to Judge R. David Proctor, who recently issued a caustic order in Whitworth v. Mezrano, No. 2:20-cv-00756-RDP-HNJ (N.D. Ala. Jan. 13, 2023), advising attorneys to save their zealous advocacy efforts for consequential matters only.

The defendants in Whitworth moved for summary judgment on the plaintiff’s claims. The court extended the plaintiff’s deadline to respond to the defendants’ summary judgment motion to 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, December 15, 2022. While the plaintiff ultimately filed her opposition brief on that Thursday afternoon, she did so at 5:15 p.m.

The defendants immediately moved to strike the opposition brief solely on the basis that “it was filed fifteen minutes late.” The court denied the motion, finding the defendants’ motion “petty” and unbecoming of the profession. While the court noted that “[t]here are no doubt many other instances when [fifteen] minutes could make a world of difference, . . . the electronic filing of an opposition brief . . . on a late Thursday afternoon [wa]s not one of them.”

Tips:

  • Preservation of the record obviously is important. However, some issues are not worth preserving and may backfire on you. Consider whether the issue is worth preserving or whether doing so may be detrimental to you and your client.
  • When considering a move to strike your opponent’s late pleading or motion, evaluate all factors. Judges carry out the rule of law, and are thus more likely to welcome filings that assist them in making correct rulings, even if such filings are a bit untimely or otherwise deficient in some minor way.
  • As the court emphasized, the takeaway from its order should not be that missed deadlines never should be raised, rather, there are instances where timely submissions are required for preservation of rights. For example, some submissions are subject to jurisdictional deadlines; in those instances, untimely filings usually lead to a forfeiture of rights. In many courts, untimely briefs are automatically rejected, and tardy lawyers are required to move for an extension nunc pro tunc, and such motions are not always granted.
Authored By
Image: Sylvia H. Walbolt
Sylvia H. Walbolt
Image: Katarina Dobsinska
Katarina Dobsinska
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.