Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of August 20 - 24, 2018
August 25, 2018

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

AL v. Walt Disney Parks - ADA
US v. McIntosh - civil commitment
W Ala Women's Ctr v. Williamson - abortion
Walker v. City of Calhoun, Ga - bail
Meders v. Warden - ineffective assistance
McGinnis v. Am Home Mortg Servicing - punitive damages
Ft Lauderdale Food Not Bombs v. Ft Lauderdale - § 1983, 1st Amendment
Waite v. AII Acquisition - personal jurisdiction
Cableview Comms of Jax v. Time Warner Cable SE - settlement validity

Florida Supreme Court – Tallahassee

No decisions this week

First District Court of Appeal – Tallahassee

SB v. DCF - untimely appeal
Boatman v. Hardee - election, qualifying fee
Trussell v. State - theory not charged
Charles v. State - circumstantial evidence, murder, burglary
Johnson v. State - search and seizure, police dog,
McKire v. State - drug possession
Baugh v. State - sentencing
Wallace v. State - postconviction relief, fraud on court
Gonzalez v. State - juvenile sentencing
Senopoulos v. Senopoulos - personal representative, selection
St Onge v. Carriero - child support, contempt
Gomez-Cortes v. AHCA - administrative review, evidentiary hearing
Shands v. Pusha - certiorari, medical records
Progressive v. Neurology Part - second-tier certiorari, standard

Second District Court of Appeal – Lakeland

Parmley v. DCF - administrative disqualification
Derouin v. Univ Am Mort - foreclosure, face-to-face meeting
Stoddard v. State - postconviction relief
Cooley v. Cooley - equitable distribution
Martinez v. State - trial court jurisdiction, clarification motion
Gordon v. Fishman - probate, beneficiaries
Mendoza v. State - probation violation
Franklin v. State - ineffective assistance, manslaughter instructions
Robinson v. Marek - rule 1.420, failure to prosecute

Third District Court of Appeal – Miami

Citizens v. Laguerre - insurance, fee multiplier
Chakra 5 v. Miami Bch - administrative dissolution, effect; due process
Carroll v. Goll - paternity, child support
Salgado v. Suyapa-Jimenez - appellate jurisdiction, subsequent order
Safari Tours v. Pasco - auto repair, storage fees,
Broz v. Clark - settlement agreement, enforcement
Deutsche Bank v. Garcia Del Busto - foreclosure, vacatur, rule 1.540
911 Dry Solutions v. Fla Fam Ins - second-tier certiorari, appraisal
Baratta v. Costa-Martinez - indirect criminal contempt

Fourth District Court of Appeal – West Palm Beach

Johnson v. State - Melbourne; peremptory challenge
Williams v. State - criminal liability; death; intervening cause
Coleman v. State - probation violation
Torres v. Bank of NY - foreclosure; attorney’s fees; costs
Sacks v. Bank of NY Mellon - foreclosure; business records
Carter v. Grumet Trust - complaint; amendment
Westmount Fin v. Courtney Prop - counterclaim; severance; certiorari
Granger v. State - sentencing

Fifth District Court of Appeal – Daytona Beach

Roe v. State - ineffective assistance, trial
PMT NPL v. Centurion Sys - foreclosure, standing
Hart v. State - withdraw plea
Fields v. Fields - dissolution, set aside
Stucky v. State - DNA testing
Mackey v. State - postconviction relief
Green v. State - postconviction relief
Murray v. State - postconviction relief
Exalisse v. State - postconviction relief
Linville v. State - belated appeal, denial
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.