Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of December 24 - 28, 2018
December 29, 2018
U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
Colburn v. Odom - § 1983, judicial immunityIn re Walter Energy - bankruptcy
Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee
Desai v. Lawnwood - jurisdiction dischargedTrial Practices v. Hahn Loeser - witness payments
Damas v. State - capital case, direct appeal
Foster v. State - capital case, postconviction review
Duckett v. State - capital case, postconviction review
Finney v. State - capital case, postconviction review
In re Cert of Add'l Judges - annual certification, judges needed
Progressive Ins v. Fla Hosp - PIP deductible, hospital bill
Thomas v. State - capital case, postconviction review
Merck v. State - capital case, postconviction review
First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee
Tynes v. State - prohibition, Stand Your GroundWindsor v. Windsor - imputed income
Romine v. Allen - mandamus, indigent prisoners, claim screening
LaFreniere v. Craig-Myers - corporate shield doctrine
D'Amico v. Smith - habeas corpus
Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland
Newton v. State - sentencingBailey v. St Louis - tort damages, disgorgement
Farrey's Hardware v. Coltin Elec - lien, fraud; certiorari, bond release
Harris v. Bank of NY - foreclosure, fees
Penton v. State - postconviction relief
Delgado-Cruz v. State - postconviction relief
Inman v. Inman - alimony
Jefferson v. State - prohibition, Stand Your Ground
Third District Court of Appeal - Miami
Junior v. LaCroix - immigration detainer, trial court jurisdictionRJ Reynolds v. Schleider - Engle progeny; remittitur, closing arguments
Losada v. State - competency
MetroPCS v. Porter - arbitration
Daum v. Adweiss - conversion
Wright v. Tribble - parental rights, termination
Bank of NY v. Obermeyer - foreclosure, rule 1.540, costs award
FRS v. Bd of Pilot Commr's - certiorari, appellate jurisdiction, agency action
Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach
No opinions this week.
Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach
Grant v. Citizens Bank - en banc; foreclosure, statute of limitationsSalazar v. Walt Disney - judicial estoppel, federal standard
Sonneman v. State - juror interview, post-verdict
Clark v. State - right to self-representation
Smith v. State - sentence
Watson v. State - postconviction relief
USAA v. Fla Hosp Med Ctr - certified conflict, certified question; PIP, deductible
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.
The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.