Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of February 5 - 9, 2018
February 05, 2018
U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
Target Media v. Specialty Marketing - defamation, Rooker-Feldman doctrineSalinas v. Ramsey - post-judgment discovery, limitations
ML Healthcare v. Publix - collateral sources, spoliation
Godelia v. Zoll Services - products, negligent infliction of emotional distress
Green v. Georgia - habeas corpus, ineffective assistance, exhaustion
Florida Supreme Court – Tallahassee
Hamilton v. State - capital case, postconviction relief Rodgers v. State - capital case, postconviction relief; Hurst
In re Std Jury Instr (Crim) - amended instructions
In re Std Jury Instr (Crim) - additional amendments
First District Court of Appeal – Tallahassee
Stewart v. Stewart - equitable distribution Ash v. Campion - dissolution, contempt
Murry v. State - missing transcript
Berry v. State - competency
Walker v. State - competency
Thompson v. State - pro se sanctions
US Bank v. Tranumn - attorney's fees, following merits reversal
In re 73 Engle Cases - dismissal with prejudice
Staines v. RJ Reynolds - Engle progeny, dismissal with prejudice
Copeland v. State - sentencing
Nassirou v. Borba - marital dissolution
Crapo v. Provident Grp - taxes, real property
Burnett v. Burnett - dissolution, alimony, insurance, fees
Nolley v. State - constructive possession; opinion on guilt
Cheney v. State - Faretta inquiry
Hunt v. Lightfoot - certiorari, discovery, surveillance video
DMS v. Ferron - prohibition, wrongful denial of claims
Second District Court of Appeal – Lakeland
Soria v. Soria - equitable distribution, alimony Persaud v. Persaud - alimony, child support
St Louis v. State - double jeopardy
Grimes v. Lottes - real property, broker commission, misrepresentation
GAL v. DCF - parental rights, termination
DeJesus v. MJRK - homestead, lien
Third District Court of Appeal – Miami
Douglas v. State - postconviction relief HSBC Bank v. Buset - foreclosure, standing; expert testimony, legal issues
Wright v. State - pro se sanctions
Williams v. Nuno - service of process
Worth v. Estate of Stern - certiorari, punitive damages
Diaz v. US Bank - foreclosure, sale while rehearing pending
Rodriguez v. State - prohibition, Stand Your Ground immunity
Bardakjy v. Empire Inv - appellate jurisdiction, appealable order
Gutierrez v. State - sentencing
Lincoln Enter v. Bookstein - appellate jurisdiction, stay, eviction
Fourth District Court of Appeal – West Palm Beach
Oakley v. State - sentencing Platt v. State - sentencing; offer of counsel
Sabido v. Bank of NY Mellon - appellate attorney's fees
Diaz v. Vasquez - marital dissolution; venue
Pierre v. State - ineffective assistance; appellate counsel
Fifth District Court of Appeal – Daytona Beach
Nabbie v. Orlando Outlet - guaranty Progressive v. Fla Hosp - PIP, deductible, certified question
Prewitt v. Kimmons - trust, fiduciary duties
Browne v. State - robbery with weapon
Hall v. Southcreek Homeowners - homeowners association, assessments
Lapinski v. Green Tree - foreclosure, deficiency waived
Keller v. Ramseyer - injunction for protection
Restoration v. ASI - assignment of benefits
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.
The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.