Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of January 22 - 26, 2018

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

US v. Presendieu - plea, sentencing 
LMP v. Broward Cnty Sch Bd - IDEA, standing 
US Commodity Futures Trading Comm v. Southern Trust Metals- Commodities fraud 
Keister v. Bell - preliminary injunction, first amendment 
Madison v. Ala DOC - order vacating opinion 
US v. Llewlyn - sentence reduction 
Georgia v. Pruitt - preliminary injunction, CWA 
Smith v. RJ Reynolds - Engle, comparative fault 
Humana Med Plan v. Western Heritage Ins - en banc

Florida Supreme Court – Tallahassee

Anderson v. State - capital case, postconviction relief; Hurst 
Finney v. State - capital case, postconviction relief; Hurst 
Hartley v. State - capital case, postconviction relief; Hurst 
Jeffries v. State - capital case, postconviction relief; Hurst 
Kelley v. State - capital case, postconviction relief; Hurst 
Lightbourne v. State - capital case, postconviction relief; Hurst 
Morris v. State - capital case, postconviction relief; Hurst 
Stewart v. State - capital case, postconviction relief; Hurst 
Trepal v. State - capital case, postconviction relief; Hurst 
Trotter v. State - capital case, postconviction relief; Hurst

First District Court of Appeal – Tallahassee

Christian v. State - competency hearing 
Johnson v. State - jury selection 
Ferrandino v. Riley - non-party subpoena 
Betts v. State - pro se sanctions 
Harrison v. Lee Auto - appellate jurisdiction, summary judgment 
Allen v. State - untimely appeal 
Thomas v. State - double jeopardy; fees and costs 
Perez v. State - competency hearing 
Homestead v. Foust - workers’ compensation 
Delgado v. AHCA - Medicaid lien, wrongful death settlement 
Speegle v. Rhoden - injunction, stay, companion criminal case

Second District Court of Appeal – Lakeland

Richards v. State - sexual predator registration 
Bermudez v. State - double jeopardy 
Baker v. State - probation revocation 
Wirth v. State - sentencing 
PHH Mort v. Parish - foreclosure, default, paragraph 22

Third District Court of Appeal – Miami

State v. Shine - sentencing 
Two Islands v. Clarke - real property, easements, litigation privilege 
Burton v. State - court appearance, video confession 
Jester v. Pawley - unjust enrichment, limitations 
Leggett v. State - grant theft, intent 
Holmes v. State - pro se sanctions 
Banco de los Trabajadores v. Cortez - personal jurisdiction, mootness 
Cadet v. State - jail credit 
McKenzie v. State - belated appeal 
McDade v. State - postconviction relief

Fourth District Court of Appeal – West Palm Beach

Barton v. State - search and seizure; cell phone 
Goldman v. Lustig - dockage rights; easements 
DFG Group v. Heritage Manor - attorney’s fees; damages 
Newton v. State - booking photograph; evidence 
Clark v. State - hood or mask enhancement; s. 775.0845 
Longo v. Assoc Limousine - impleader; proceedings supplementary 
Kirschner v. Kirschner - marital settlement agreement 
Cabo Flats Jupiter v. Dawley - garnishment; summary judgment

Fifth District Court of Appeal – Daytona Beach

State Farm v. Harmon - remittitur, future medical expenses 
21st Century v. Smith - harmless error 
Penton v. Orange Cnty - lease, convention center, water damage 
Sargent v. State - right to counsel 
Wells v. State - probation revocation
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.


The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.