Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of June 4 - 8, 2018
June 04, 2018
U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
US v. Jim - IGRA, tax, intervenorPerry v. Schumacher Group - jurisdiction
Manners v. Cannella - § 1983, qualified immunity
Campbell v. US - habeas corpus
Ponton v. Fla DOC - habeas corpus
US v. Man - ACEA, Brady
LabMD v. FTC - FTCA
Minott v. M/Y Brunello - maritime lien
Meridor v. US - immigration
US v. McLean - threatening a judge
Brink v. Raymond James - SLUSA
Comparelli v. Republica Bolivariana de Venezuela - FSIA, act of state doctrine
Florida Supreme Court – Tallahassee
Levandowski v. State - sex offender probation
First District Court of Appeal – Tallahassee
Hart v. State - juvenile sentencing Hall v. State - Miranda, juvenile sentencing, constitutionality
Wilhelm v. State - sentencing
Lang v. State - double jeopardy, preservation
Kapsch TrafficCom v. DOT - patent license, competitive bidding
Azalea Trace v. Matos - attorney's fees, law of the case
Sarasota Cnty Sch Bd v. Brockman - workers' compensation
Campbell v. State - Jimmy Ryce Act
Fla Lottery v. Seneca One - sovereign immunity, appealable order
Liberty New v. Bennett - foreign judgments, domestication
Smith v. Daniel - parenting order, domestic violence
Jackson v. State - rule 3.800(c) motion, effect on appeal
Myers v. Pasco Cnty Sch Bd - workers' compensation
Mock v. State - double jeopardy
Jacobsen v. State - murder, evidence
Williams v. State - murder, evidence
Pope v. State - Good Samaritan Act
McCloud v. State - probation revocation
Second District Court of Appeal – Lakeland
Campbell v. State - ineffective assistance Johnson v. Johnson - delayed final judgment, new trial
Rollins v. State - postconviction relief
Trafalgar Woods v. Cape Coral - credits re irrigation water, ordinance
Deutsche Bank v. Sheard - foreclosure, default, notice
Stewart v. State - postconviction relief
Parish v. State - postconviction relief
Bank of NY v. Barahona - foreclosure, intervention
Filipkowski v. State - postconviction relief
Third District Court of Appeal – Miami
Valiente v. RJ Behar - Slavin, roadway landscaping US Bank v. Western Homes - foreclosure, limitations
Alfonso v. State - intervention
Martinez v. Fernandez-Uriate - rule 1.260, substitution after death
US Bank v. Morelli - foreclosure, limitations
Kipp v. Amy Slate's - Death on the High Seas Act, jurisdiction
Miami v. FOP - arbitration, scope
Rodriguez v. Roca - marital settlement agreement
Gutierrez v. Gutierrez - marital settlement agreement
Graves v. State - sentencing
Gonzalez v. Hilton - venue, § 47.122
Miami v. Miami Firefighters - union, CBA, temporary injunction
Burnett v. Starwood Hotels - mandamus, circuit court transfer review
CHC v. Miami Herald - certiorari, media access to court records
Sands Pointe v. Aelion - prohibition, disqualification, judicial election
Fourth District Court of Appeal – West Palm Beach
Moscatiello v. State - hearsay; former testimony White v. State - sentencing
Amro v. Gazze - marital settlement; attorney's fees
Evans v. State - hearsay; mistrial; witness outburst
Grimes v. State - prior conviction evidence
Gelber v. Brydger - alimony; retirement accounts
Salerno v. Del Mar Fin - alcohol; employer liability
Castleman v. Bicaldo - marital dissolution
Rose v. State - plea; competency
Sanchez v. Martin - aggravation; preexisting condition
Garrido v. Garrido - lodestar; attorney's fees
Rowe v. Macaw - eviction; rent; court registry
Fitzpatrick v. Meredith - summary judgment; indemnification
Ingraham v. State - withdrawal of plea
Louima v. State - postconviction relief
Saavedra v. State - postconviction relief
State v. Chantiloupe - untimely notice; death penalty
CJLM v. DCF - dependency
Fifth District Court of Appeal – Daytona Beach
Easter v. Orlando - red-light camera, class cert Williams v. State - sentencing
Haywood v. Bacon - child visitation
Taylor v. State - postconviction relief
DF v. State - habeas corpus
©2025 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.
The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.