Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of May 7 - 11, 2018
May 07, 2018
U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
Gagliardi v. City of Boca Raton - mootnessBailey v. Rocky Mtn Hldgs - Airline Deregulation Act, preemption
US v. Stein - summary judgment evidence
Montanez v. Carvajal - search & seizure
Devengoechea v. Venezuela - FSIA, sovereign immunity
Gutierrez v. Wells Fargo - arbitration
Florida Supreme Court – Tallahassee
In re Std Jury Instr (Crim) - trafficking instruction Morris v. State - capital case, postconviction relief
In re Fla R Crim Pro - amended rule
In re Code J Conduct - amended canon
First District Court of Appeal – Tallahassee
Crosley v. State - sentencing Bell v. State - sufficiency of evidence, standard
Vansmith v. State - certiorari; involuntary commitment
Burch v. Davis - premature appeal, no relinquishment
Second District Court of Appeal – Lakeland
Espinoza-Brito v. State - probation Arteaga v. State - postconviction relief
Nicon Constr v. Prager - insurance, breach, assignment
Johnson v. Deutsche Bank - foreclosure, standing
Williams v. State - witness tampering; certified conflict
Ambrogio v. McGuire - summary judgment, notice
Morrison v. Morrison - marital settlement agreement
Third District Court of Appeal – Miami
Love v. State - prohibition, Stand Your Ground, certified conflict State v. Pena - obstructed license plate, search and seizure
Montoya v. State - probation
Lammons v. State - closing argument, denigrating defense
Kane v. Kane - contempt
Obsessions v. Jewelry Exh - lease, exculpatory clause
Martin v. State - probation
Gidwani v. Roberts - condominium, parking spaces
State v. Maxwell - search and seizure
Sammie Inv v. Strategica - injunction, real property sale, proceeds
Rodriguez v. S Miami - certiorari, mental health records
Fourth District Court of Appeal – West Palm Beach
Melvin v. State - false information; missing child; sentencing Senser v. State - Miranda; sentencing
Burgess v. State - voir dire; cause challenges
Bellows v. Bellows - alimony; equitable distribution
RJ Reynolds v. Konzelman - punitive damages
Osorio v. State - search and seizure
Coconut Key v. Gonzalez - injunction; attorney’s fees
Diocese of Palm Beach v. Gallagher - ecclesiastical abstention doctrine
Pollock v. State - competency; plea
Fifth District Court of Appeal – Daytona Beach
Webb v. State - Nelson inquiry Domino’s Pizza v. Wiederhold - closing argument; wrongful death; spouse
Bynum v. State - competency
Millan v. State - postconviction relief
Maxwell v. State - postconviction relief
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.
The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.