Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of October 22 - 26, 2018

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

US v. Carthen – hearsay, impeachment, sentencing
US v. Jones - ACCA
US v. Hernandez - § 851 hearing, evidence rules

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

In re Fla R App P - rules amendments
In re Fla R Civ P - rules amendments
In re Fla R App P - rules amendments
Davis v. State - capital case, postconviction relief
In re Fla Std Jury Instr (Crim) - amended instructions
State v. Hollander - proposed constitutional amendment

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

No decisions this week

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Crews v. State - sentencing
DT v. State - double jeopardy
Teltschik v. State - grand theft, value
Jackson v. State - certiorari, probation modification
Perez v. State - search and seizure, laptop hard drive
Le v. Deutsche Bank - foreclosure, appellate jurisdiction

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Brown v. State - juvenile sanction revocation, due process, hearsay
Garcia-Mathies v. Pere - discovery sanctions
IDS Ins v. MSPA Claims - class certification, medical costs
MG v. State - criminal history expungement
Nieto Villamizar v. Luna Capital - proceedings supplementary
Rivera v. State - sentencing
May v. Novoa - summary affirmance

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Barthelemy v. Safeco Ins—insurance, jury instructions
Dorcely v. State—juvenile, due process
Wallace v. State—sentencing, youthful offender
Toole v. State—restitution, value
Preudhomme v. Bailey—contempt, modification
Brown v. State—probation, revocation
O’Boyle v. Gulf Stream—Sunshine Law, Public Records Act
Kellar v. Kellar—administration, undue influence
Twin Rivers Eng’g v. Pacer USA—terms and conditions
Bent v. State—shoplifting, presence
Johnson v. Townsend—surviving spouse
Dixon v. State—sentencing
GAQL v. State—cellphone contents, Fifth Amendment

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Priest v. Velisek – new trial, grant; negligence
Williams v. State – written order, competency; confessed error
Skelly v. Skelly – child support; magistrate, objection 
Santiago v. JS Bank – voluntary dismissal; release note, mortgage
DCF v. Tanner – certiorari, involuntary commitment

Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.


The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.