Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of October 29 - November 2, 2018
U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
Intl Fidelity Ins v. Americaribe-Moriarty JV - attorney’s fees
Jones v. Fla DOC - habeas corpus, ADEPA, limitations
Washington v. Soc Security Commr - Social Security Act
Fastcase v. Lawriter - subject-matter jurisdiction
McCullough v. Finley - immunity
PETA v. Miami Seaquarium - en banc
Phillips v. Warden - habeas corpus, limitations
In re Garrett - sentencing, ACCA
Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee
Nock v. State - rule of completeness; impeachment
DH v. Adept Comm Serv - fundamental error, GAL, limitations, minors
Shepard v. State - automobile as weapon
First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee
Gov Scott v. AHF MCO - public records, Governor’s calendar
Venn v. Fowlkes - stalking injunction
Wilkins v. State - untimely appeal
Tucker v. State - Faretta inquiry
Halpern v. Koikos - missing transcript
Davis v. State - search and seizure
Coffell v. State - sentencing
Ford v. State - postconviction relief; implied deadline
Holt v. Holt - void order, rule 1.540
Floyd v. State - postconviction relief
Normandy Ins v. Sorto - workers’ compensation
State v. Scharlepp - prohibition; judicial disqualification
Shaw v. State - belated appeal
Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland
Toth v. Miller-Toth - adopting proposed judgments
IK v. State - delinquency, resisting arrest
Deutsche Bank v. Noll - foreclosure, standing
Deutsche Bank v. Noll - fees, costs, following merits
Progressive v. SHL Enters - second-tier certiorari, insurance, windshield law
Progressive v. Fry Enters - second-tier certiorari, due process
Humphrey v. State - pro se sanctions
Mattick v. Lisch - rule 1.260, death, substitution
Third District Court of Appeal - Miami
Nieburg v. Sulzberger - legal malpractice
Bank of NY v. Arnoux - foreclosure, limitations
Aquasol CA v. HSBC - foreclosure, standing; judicial disqualification
Santos v. HSBC - foreclosure, appellate jurisdiction
Am Shuttle v. Zilber - asset purchase agreement
Ortega v. Citizens - insurance, water damage
Levin v. Pritchard - certiorari, punitive damages
Lovell v. Perez - real estate commission, indemnification
Venezia v. Wells Fargo - foreclosure sale, appellate jurisdiction
Berenyi v. DCF - adoption, notice
RDS v. DCF - dependency
FP&L v. Velez - prohibition, PSC jurisdiction
Torres v. Variety Children’s Hosp - certiorari, patient record
Ryan v. Ryan - timesharing; appellate jurisdiction
Walker v. Tekerman - appellate jurisdiction
Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach
Bluefield Ranch v. SFWMD - rehearing; standing; administrative proceeding
Supria v. Goshen Mortg - costs; timeliness; appellate order; rendition
Cadavid v. State - cross-exam; break; attorney/client discussion; harmless error
JH v. State - search and seizure
Davis v. State - public defender fee
Torres v. Deutsche Bank - foreclosure; conditions precedent; paragraph 22 notice
Rickard v. Nature’s Sleep - s. 57.105; sanctions; attorney’s fees; client consult
Curry v. State - postconviction relief
Howard v. Gualt - foreclosure; default; substitute service; diligence
CB v. DCF - parental rights
Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach
Raymond v. State - attempted murder; 911 call, Confrontation Clause, hearsay
Blackburn v. Wissner - dissolution; marital home, credit, payments
Parcilla v. State - competency, written order
Caldwell v. Caldwell - domestic violence injunction
Robinson v. Robinson - domestic violence injunction, sufficient evidence
Davis v. State - burglary, grand theft; costs, restitution
Rotunda v. Rotunda - dissolution; temporary fees, costs, suit money
Evans v. State - Anders, scrivener’s error
Harris v. State - postconviction relief
Progressive v. Fla Hosp - certiorari, PIP deductible; certified conflict, certified question
The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.