Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of April 1 - 5, 2019
April 06, 2019
U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
Guevara v. NCL (Bahamas) - expert reports, negligenceKroma Makeup v. Boldface Licensing - Lanham Act
US v. Cooks - search & seizure
Taylor v. Hughes - § 1983, immunity
US v. Moss - sentencing
Holzman v. Gerald & Assocs - FDCPA, FCCPA
Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee
Wetzel v. Travelers - pro se sanctionsFirst District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee
Marocco v. Brabec - sword & shield doctrine, § 713.29, fraudulent lien,Lowry v. State - certiorari, involuntary commitment
Dorsey v. Robinson - MRTA, possession, intestate succession
Smith v. State - hearsay, child sex abuse, jail recording
McClash v. Long Bar Pointe - administrative review, appellate standing
Stamitoles v. State - second-tier certiorari, resisting officer
McLendon v. D'Amico - timesharing
Bishop v. State - probation revocation, ineffective assistance
Gordon v. State - sentencing
Kimmons v. State - probation revocation
Lee v. State - hearsay, 911 call, jail recordings
Deloach v. State - murder, evidence
Burns v. State - juvenile sentencing
Grimsley v. State - burden shifting to defense
Robinson v. State - murder solicitation, evidence
Rodgers v. State - competency
Certo v. Certo - foreclosure, standing
Dorsey v. Dorsey - marital dissolution
Terry v. State - manufacturing cannabis, evidence
Hester v. State - sentencing
DOH v. Redner - marijuana, cultivation, Fla Constitution
Kneer v. Lincare - workers' compensation, constitutionality, evidence
Randstad v. Barr - certiorari, expert medical advisor
Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland
Lehmann v. Cocoanut Bayou - real property, conveyancesTecklenburg v. Kouremetis - court records, confidentiality
Anderson v. Mitchell - certiorari, accident report privilege
Dooley v. State - Stand Your Ground, instructions
Wells Fargo v. Quest - foreclosure, documents, self-authentication
Buggs v. State - sentencing
Davis v. State - sentencing
Schofield v. Judd - habeas corpus
Third District Court of Appeal - Miami
Diaz v. State - probation revocationCharlier v. State - murder, evidence
MC Trust v. Cohen de Mishaan - personal jurisdiction
Maercks v. Maercks - probate, appellate jurisdiction
Wilcox v. DOR - child support, missing transcript
Bazzichelli v. Deutsche Bank - rule 1.540
Sibley v. Sibley - trust, interpretation
Waldman v. Laquer Fam - foreclosure sale
Publicidad Vepaco v. Mezerhane - certiorari, competing counsel
Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach
Viladoine v. State - trial amendmentGindel v. Centex Homes - tolling, certification
Morrill v. State - value, proof
OAG v. Nationwide Pools - due process, consent judgment
Kronen v. Deutsche Bank - foreclosure, standing
Tejada v. Forfeiture - 8th Amendment
SLV v. Toth - declaratory judgment, findings
JR v. State - comprehensive evaluation
Rowe-Lewis v. Lewis - evidentiary hearing, factual findings
Roland v. State - sanction
Hastie v. State - sentencing
Bynes v. State - sentencing
Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach
Phillips v. US Bank - foreclosure, attorney's feesFla Organic v. Advent Environmental - attorney's fees; jurisdiction, trial
Ward v. State - child abuse; defense witness, exclusion, sanction
Johnson v. Johnson - dissolution, child support, parenting plan
Taylor v. State- child pornography, double jeopardy
Paulette v. Rosella- child support, mediated settlement agreement
Corrigan v. Vargas - child support, mediated parenting plan, vacate
King v. State - Spencer bar
BBI v. Win-Development - Wheaton, offer of judgment, email
Weathers v. State - Spencer bar
DCF v. Rodriguez - certiorari, involuntary commitment
McWaters v. State - Spencer bar
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.