Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of February 25 - March 1, 2019
March 02, 2019

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

No decisions this week

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

No decisions this week

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Barry v. State - consolidation, collateral crime evidence
Knapp v. Knapp - child support, venue
Lanier v. State - child neglect
Windsor Falls v. Davis - attorney's fees, fees for fees, findings
State v. Dougherty - sentencing
Pearce v. Boudreaux - child relocation
Leon v. Lakeshore Gardens - certiorari, eminent domain, parties
Otis v. Craig-Myers - crime-fraud exception
RJ Reynolds v. Olson - untimely appeal
Lee Mem'l v. AHCA - Medicaid services, aliens, audit
Cape Mem'l v. AHCA - Medicaid services, aliens, audit
Davis v. Steak 'n Shake - settlement proposal, amended pleading
Smith v. State - probation revocation
Grandison v. State - postconviction relief
Askew v. State - postconviction relief
Martinez v. State - postconviction relief
Elliott v. State - postconviction relief

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Sammons v. State - right to counsel
In re Engle Progeny - jury selection, cause challenge
Nelson v. State - search and seizure
Johnson v. State - competency
Student Loan Trust v. Meyer - loans, breach, standing
Elliott v. State - right to counsel
FL-7 v. SWF - fees reversal, following merits
Harper v. GEICO - insurance, bad faith, cure
Love v. State - postconviction relief
Tracey v. Wells Fargo - insufficient evidence, scope of remand, certified question
Kenf v. Jabez Restor - unjust enrichment, damages

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Tejera v. Lincoln Lending - limitations, fraud, delayed discovery
Vision v. Coscan - settlement enforcement
AA v. State - prohibition, delinquency, contempt
Brito v. S Fid P&C - sham pleadings
Evans v. Murphy - rule 1.540, amended motion, law of the case
Del Pino Allen v. Santelises - defamation, absolute immunity
Perez v. Dwyer - lack of transcript
Polanco v. Citizens - judicial assignments, review

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Warthen v. State - sentencing
Cone v. US Bank - equitable subrogation, lien
Thompson v. State - sentencing
Martinez v. State - references to public official; unfair prejudice
Ice Legal v. Nationstar - sanctions; due process
Lake Worth Surgical v. Gates - trade secrets, confidentiality order
First Church v. Site Concepts - venue, place of payment

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Darden Restaurants v. Singh - tax assessment, tangible personal property
Rodriguez v. Rodriguez - dissolution, income withholding
Kempton v. McComb - negligence, comparative fault, alcohol or drug defense
Henry v. State - sentencing, scrivener's error
QA v. State - competency, written order
Gilchrist v. State - sentencing, juvenile
Welch v. State - postconviction relief, Spencer warning
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.