Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of June 3 - 7, 2019

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

In re Dept of Caldas - discovery in aid of foreign proceeding
Pitch v. US - en banc
Newcomb v. Spring Creek Cooler - assumption of risk

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

DM v. MD - jurisdiction discharged, harmless error
In re Std Jury Instr (Crim) - amended instructions
Wetzel v. State - pro se sanctions

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Milliron v. State - motion to suppress, dispositive nature
Byrd v. State - pretrial treatment program, transfer; sentencing
Weakley v. State - search and seizure
Sussman v. DOC - pro se sanctions
Jarvis v. State - sentencing
Kline v. State - preservation of error, weight of evidence
Holder v. Lopez - alimony
Smith v. Smith - child support
Earl v. State - sentencing, relief, certified conflict
Griffin v. Griffin - equitable distribution
Black Point v. Freedom Mort - certiorari, rent payments
Osborne v. State - motion to suppress, reserving appellate rights
AF v. DCF - parental rights, termination

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Green Emerald v. 21st Mort - foreclosure, standing, due process
Nugent v. State - constructive possession, contraband
Ebeling v. Chambers - probate, trust construction
Tritschler v. Tritschler - marital dissolution
Hunter v. State - sentencing
Reed v. State - rule 3.800(a), scope
Madill v. Rivercrest CA - attorney's fees, time extension
Fountainbleau v. Hire Us - certiorari, arbitration, personal jurisdiction

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Florescu v. Royal Caribbean - pleading employment
MBLock Inv v. Bovis Lend Lease - construction defects, res judicata, successors
Rodriguez v. Miami - contempt, arbitration order compliance
Goodenow v. Nationstar Mort - foreclosure, jury trial waiver
Trelles v. Le Basque - tortious interference, summary judgment
Rokosz v. Haccoun - marital settlement, lis pendens, homestead
NB v. DCF - parental rights, termination, subject matter jurisdiction

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Dippolito v. State - opening the door, entrapment, collateral crimes
Cuciak v. State - conflict-free counsel
Joseph v. State - reasonable suspicion
Ramos v. State - jury instructions, elements
State v. Crossley-Robinson - downward departure
White v. Wells Fargo - foreclosure, indispensable party
Fassy v. Bank of NY - attorney's fees, costs
Fischer v. Fischer - depleted asset, attorney's fees
Holmes v. State - postconviction relief, amend
DLT v. State - disposition, preservation
Deutsche Bank v. JB Inv - foreclosure, payment history
Burns v. Burns - timeliness, notice of appeal, filing fee
Bythwood v. State - certified conflict

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Purcell v. State- withdraw plea, good cause
Stokes v. DOR - paternity, support
Mullins v. Mullins - will, homestead order; property sale, partition
Henry v. State - Anders, scrivener's error
Saboff v. Saboff - new trial, delay
Taylor v. Hanlex Development - quiet title, judgment on pleadings
Volpi v. State - Anders, scrivener's error
Rosa v. Rosa - vexatious litigation, fees, substantial evidence
Stevens v. State - Spencer bar, pro se
Mixon v. State - postconviction relief
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.