Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of May 13 - 17, 2019
May 17, 2019

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

US v. Grimon - subject-matter jurisdiction
Alliant Tax Credit Fund v. Murphy - fraudulent transfer
Thompson v. US - crimes of violence

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Lang v. State - capital case, postconviction relief
In re Fla R Civ Pro - proposed class action amendment

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Sherman v. State - double jeopardy
Stephens v. State - ineffective assistance, principal instruction, grand theft
Farid v. Rabbath - equitable distribution, modification
Kelly v. SunTrust - appellate jurisdiction, foreclosure, moratorium request
Simmons v. State - resentencing
Baldwin v. State - probation violation
Sundwall v. FWC - mailbox rule
Wilson v. State - postconviction relief
Lee v. State - ineffective assistance
DOR v. Forman - filing fees, underfunded clerk's office
Telfer Faherty v. Caplick - workers' compensation
Izaguirre v. Beach Walk - workers' compensation
Tallahassee Mem v. Dukes - certiorari, punitive damages
Dygart v. State - double jeopardy
Moss v. State - reclassification for firearm
Hayes v. State - sentencing
Thorne v. State - sentencing
Lindsay v. State - continuance
Stamm v. State - habeas corpus, mootness
Klenk v. Ransom - stalking injunction
Addison Drywall v. Torres - workers' compensation
Sumners v. Thompson - dating violence injunction
Watkins v. State - ineffective assistance, appellate counsel
Bank of NY v. Johnson - foreclosure, sanctions, dismissal
Currie v. Colvin - appellate jurisdiction, order granting motion to dismiss
Brooks v. Willis - mandamus

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Jacobs v. State - double jeopardy
Alexander v. Harris - child support, garnishment
Topalli v. Feliciano - continuance, fees and costs, execution
Citi Mortgage v. Chesney - foreclosure, standing
NGS v. State - delinquency, corpus delicti, gun possession
Progressive v. Pawelczyk - insurance, covered auto, insured

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

State v. Calix - postconviction relief
State v. Ellis - postconviction relief
OneWest Bank v. Leek-Tannenbaum - surviving spouse, mortgage, borrower
Perez v. Perez - marital dissolution, income, alimony, timesharing
Sanders v. State - pro se sanctions
Byrd v. State - pro se sanctions

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Bruce v. State - sentencing
Helms v. State - hearsay; prior inconsistent statement
Dieujuste v. State - search and seizure
Breland v. State - double jeopardy
Mitchell v. State - probation violation; double jeopardy
Jeancharles v. DOR - administrative support order; continuance
TLB v. State - search and seizure; school resource officer
Zubricky v. Zubricky - martial dissolution; alimony
Godwin v. Godwin- marital settlement agreement; contempt
FL Homes 1 v. Kokolis - foreclosure; joinder; record title holder

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Levine v. Stimmel - attorney's fees, entitlement
Harris v. Mims - dissolve injunction, changed circumstances
Lamadrid v. Rivera - certiorari; intervention, disqualification
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.