Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of September 2 - 6, 2019

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

USA v. Feldman - severance, experts, double jeopardy, sentencing
Knight v. Fla DOC - habeas corpus
Jenkins v. Ala DOC - habeas corpus

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Holt v. Keetley - jurisdiction discharged
Rogers v. State - capital case, direct appeal

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Gray v. ACHA - Medicaid lien, reduction
Crapo v. Academy- en banc denial, educational institutions, value adjustment board

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

State v. Fay - burglary, prima facie case
Bolduc v. State - postconviction relief, self-defense instruction

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Silver v. State - Williams rule, hearsay by inescapable inference
Linares v. Bank of Am - foreclosure, rule 1.540
Surijon v. Zarria - premature final judgment
Alvarenga v. Milos Enters - Applegate affirmance, late expert
Padilla v. Padilla - fraud, fraud in inducement, forgery
Clarke v. Coca Cola - discovery, multiple depositions
Williams v. State - postconviction relief
Taufer v. Wells Fargo - foreclosure, appellate standing, rule 1.540
Allen v. State - sentencing
Abrams v. Const Life Ins- insurance, home health coverage
Hernandez v. State - sentencing, ineffective assistance
Williams v. State - sentencing; pro se sanctions
Blamey v. Menadier - certiorari; attorney disqualification
Oliver v. State - sentencing; pro se sanctions
Holmes v. State - habeas corpus; pro se sanctions

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

No decisions this week.

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

No decisions this week.
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.