Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of April 27 - May 1, 2020
May 02, 2020
U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
Medley v. Dish Network - FCCPA, TCPAKnight v. Fla DOC - postconviction relief
Knox v. Roper Pump - employment, discrimination, retaliation
Jacobsen v. Fla Sec of State - elections, ballot challenge, standing
James v. Holman Correctional - postconviction relief
Miami Gardens v. Wells Fargo - Fair Housing Act, en banc vote
Grange v. Baisden - insurance coverage
Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee
No decisions this weekFirst District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee
Parsons v. Jacksonville - Human Rights Ordinance, challengesBank of NY v. Barber - foreclosure, defenses, notice
Walker v. Walker - alimony, findings
Rogers v. State - en banc, sentencing, certified conflict
Bryan v. Wheels - timesharing
Rhoden v. Rhoden - alimony
Harrison v. Lee Auto - FDUTPA
Harris v. State - postconviction relief
Jackson v. State - closing argument
Swander v. State - sentencing
Horn v. State - competency
Rupp v. State - appellate jurisdiction
State Farm v. Markovits - attorney's fees, fees for fees
Kotlarz v. Kotlarz - equalizing payment, collection, fees
Groelinger v. Rogers - appellate jurisdiction
MB Doral v. State - rule challenge, delegated authority, limits
Hoffman v. Hoffman - UM benefits
Williams v. State - reasonable doubt instruction
Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland
Rivera v. State - Stand Your GroundStreet v. Street - marital assets
Bullington v. State - prior consistent statements
Williams v. CVT - surety bond, § 320.27, private action
Zuppardo v. JH Inv - appellate jurisdiction
Peret v. State - bias evidence
Duhamel v. Duhamel - charging lien
Gorman v. State - probation revocation
Schwebel v. State - postconviction relief
Elizon DB Trans Agt v. Ivy Chase - clarification, foreclosure, standing
Paskert v. Steffensmeier - stalking injunction
Helix Elec v. Power Design - personal jurisdiction
Booker v. State - ineffective assistance
Norman v. DCI Biologicals - slip and fall, constructive notice
Uppal v. Nationstar Mort - appellate jurisdiction
Greenspire Global v. Sarasota Green - personal jurisdiction
Third District Court of Appeal - Miami
Diaz-Silveira v. Diaz-Silveira - equitable distributionSchminky v. State - murder of law enforcement officer, instructions
Knespler v. State - prosecutor disqualification; grand theft
Najeera v. Tropical Supermarket - summary judgment, grocery
Waldon v. Guardianship of Waldon - probate, guardian, conflict of interest
Aktan v. Gotham Coll Srvs - lack of appellate counsel, transcript
Pritchard v. Levin - fraud, duty to disclose, merger
Jackson v. State - ineffective assistance
Castro v. Mercantil - garnishment
CWelt-2008 Series v. Park Gardens - arbitration, Fla Condo Act
Small v. State - habeas corpus
CD v. State - delinquency
Zaida Plaza v. Acurio - remittitur, lack of transcript
Point Conversions v. Pfeffer & Marin - mandamus
Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach
Klein v. Klein - probate; settlement proceeds, allocationRamos v. North Star - direct criminal contempt, perjury, due process
Blinston v. Palm Beach Sheriff's Office - Risk Protection Order, procedure
RB v. State - delinquency, high-risk commitment, DJJ recommendation
Buchmann v. State - sentencing
MB v. DCF - termination, parental rights
Mejia v. Mejia - spousal support, findings
Ross v. Carbone - ex parte injunction
Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach
Pace v. Pace - dissolution, child support, alimonyJones v. Jones - dissolution, equitable distribution
Wilkins v. State - first-degree murder
Delgado v. Morejon - child support, modification; attorney's fees
Raleigh v. Cornerstone Quarry - foreclosure, notice
Palomino v. State - Anders appeal, scrivener's error
DCF v. Campbell - certiorari, commitment
Wamsley v. State - Anders appeal, written order
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.