Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of July 6 - 10, 2020
July 11, 2020

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Cooper v. Midland Credit - FDCPA
D'Onofrio v. Costco - employment, FCRA
USA v. Ross - preservation of error, search and seizure
In re Price - postconviction relief
Canal A v. USCIS - immigration, APA
USA v. Ruan - RICO, controlled substances,
Caradigm USA v. Pruithealth - contract

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Merck v. State - capital case, postconviction relief
In re Fam L Forms - amended forms

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Finch v. State - ill will-hatred-spite
Brown v. State - evidence, state of mind
Lee v. State - pro se sanctions
Brooks v. State - pro se sanctions

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Foley & Lardner v. Unknown Heirs - foreclosure, standing
Floyd v. State - postconviction relief
Giles v. Giles - marital dissolution, alimony, distribution
Spurgeon v. State - postconviction relief
Doe v. Natt - arbitration; certified conflict
Horton v. State - Stand Your Ground
JAL v. RMA - paternity, appellate attorney's fees, payment schedule
Baez-Ortiz v. State - evidence, Williams rule
Martino v. Martino - guardianship, fee petitions, § 57.105
Parravani v. State - sentencing
Strong v. State - written opinion request; sentencing; certified conflict
Vogel v. Cornerstone Docs - premises liability, elevator, summary judgment
Drish v. Bos - amending pleadings
Washington v. Brown - cyberstalking injunction
Life Care v. Croft - certiorari, punitive damages, nursing home
Wiendl v. Wiendl - rule 12.491, applying for hearing
Bouchard v. Bouchard - certiorari, GAL disqualification
Samsung v. Hildreth - certiorari, products liability, protective order
TM v. DCF - parental rights, termination
Huminski v. Gilbert - pro se sanctions

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Sexton v. State - Stand Your Ground
AC v. AHCA - Medicaid benefits, fair hearing
Santisteban v. State - Spanish interpreter
Coriat v. Coriat - child support, timesharing
Suarez v. Coral Gables Imports - appellate jurisdiction, closure stamp, finality
Hernandez v. Philip Morris - attorney's fees, quantum meruit
Ryerson v. State - preservation of error, evidence
Stivelman v. Stivelman - certiorari, protective order

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Krysiak v. Dawson - Binger, new treating doctor opinion
Reaves v. State - sentencing
Int'l Univ of Health Sciences v. Abeles - personal jurisdiction
Cook v. McMillan - dating violence, injunction
Williams v. Bossicot - child support, timesharing

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Altman v. Brevard County - taking, easement
Ziegler v. Ziegler - garnishment, attorney's fees
Cookston v. State - armed burglary, competency
Brinson v. State - Spencer bar, pro se
Roberts v. State - Anders, costs
Crichton v. State - Anders, community control, specific condition
Skelly v. Skelly - child support, modification
DS v. ALH - domestic violence injunction, due process
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.